Patent litigation attorney

Felicia J. Boyd

1 tracked appearance 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant.

Specialty & background

Felicia J. Boyd is a highly experienced patent litigator and a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, where she serves as Head of IP Brands, United States. Her practice encompasses complex intellectual property disputes, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade dress. Boyd's experience spans a diverse array of industries, such as financial and investment services, medical devices (including pacemakers and defibrillators), software, music, pharmaceuticals, and manufactured goods. The sole tracked case, Bright Data, Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al., where she represented the defendant, falls within the software/internet technology realm, aligning with her described expertise.

Throughout her career, Ms. Boyd has demonstrated versatility by leading both plaintiff and defense litigation in a wide variety of intellectual property claims. While the provided case data shows a single defendant-side appearance, her professional background indicates a balanced approach to representing clients. She has achieved numerous favorable outcomes, including securing preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, advantageous settlements, and jury verdicts at trial. Ms. Boyd is also noted for her counsel on Markman strategy, briefing, and argument.

Prior to her tenure at Norton Rose Fulbright, Ms. Boyd held partner positions at Barnes & Thornburg LLP and practiced with Faegre & Benson LLP, contributing to her extensive litigation background. She is a registered patent attorney and has represented clients in contested proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Felicia J. Boyd earned her J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1987, and a B.A., cum laude, from St. Olaf College in 1984. She is admitted to the State Bar of Minnesota, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and various federal courts, including the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Federal, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits.

Firms

Roles

  • counsel1

Cases (1)