Daniel J. Brown

Summary — Daniel J. Brown (Patent Litigation)

Practice profile. Based on the tracked case data, Daniel J. Brown is a lead patent-litigation counsel affiliated with K&L Gates, with one tracked appearance to date — a defendant-side representation. The tracked case record is untitled, so no specific technology area (e.g., Wi-Fi/standards, pharma, software, or mechanical arts) can be confirmed from the docket data alone. Web-verifiable practice descriptions for a patent litigator by this name at K&L Gates could not be located, and the name is shared by several unrelated litigators (including a commercial/insurance litigator at Dorsey & Whitney in Minneapolis, a Delaware pharma/medical-device litigator at McCarter & English, and a retired pharma-focused patent trial lawyer, Daniel G. Brown, formerly at Latham & Watkins). Accordingly, the specialty and technology focus for this specific attorney cannot be reliably characterized beyond the defendant-side patent work reflected in the case list.

Side preference. The available data shows a defendant-side orientation: the single tracked appearance is on behalf of a defendant, with the attorney serving as lead counsel. There is no tracked plaintiff-side or NPE/PAE prosecution work. Given the small sample (one case), this should be read as a snapshot rather than a demonstrated pattern.

Firm context, notable matters, and PTAB/IPR experience. The attorney's current firm context is K&L Gates, where the tracked matter was handled; no prior firms relevant to a patent litigation career could be verified for this specific individual. Because the tracked case is untitled, no case names or outcomes (verdicts, Federal Circuit appeals, or settlements) can be called out from the authoritative data, and web research did not surface verifiable results attributable to this attorney. No evidence of regular IPR/PGR practice was found — that experience should be treated as unconfirmed. Bar admissions and education could not be reliably matched to the correct Daniel J. Brown (multiple attorneys share the name, with differing credentials), so they are omitted. In sum, the reliable record here is narrow: one defendant-side patent matter as lead counsel at K&L Gates, with all other practice details unverified.