D. "Bo" M. Baucum

I'll research this attorney before writing the summary.

Let me search for the specific case and firm.

Let me look for the specific attorney and case.

Professional Summary — D. "Bo" M. Baucum

Specialty / focus areas. The only tracked matter places this attorney in patent infringement litigation over consumer-electronics and streaming-media technology: the Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Tubi, Inc. suit. Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. is a Singapore-based patent holder whose asserted portfolio (e.g., U.S. Patents 9,055,254; 9,578,384; 9,820,003; 10,419,805) covers "intelligent television" and video-on-demand user interfaces and systems — i.e., software/media-delivery and consumer-device patents rather than Wi-Fi standards, pharma, or mechanical arts. The campaign has been litigated primarily in the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall/Tyler) before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne.

Side preference. On the tracked record the attorney sits entirely on the plaintiff side (1 of 1 appearances, 0 defense), acting as lead counsel for the patent owner. That is consistent with a patent-owner/NPE-side practice, but the sample is a single case and is too thin to characterize as a settled preference for either enforcing or defending.

Firm context. The tracked appearance is with The Dacus Firm, P.C., of Tyler, Texas — an East Texas trial boutique founded by Deron R. Dacus, a Texas Board–certified civil trial lawyer whose practice centers on patent and commercial litigation in the Eastern District of Texas. No prior firms for this attorney could be verified.

Notable case and outcomes. The sole tracked case is Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Tubi, Inc. Broader context for the same plaintiff's enforcement campaign (not verified as this attorney's own work): parallel E.D. Tex. suits against LG Electronics and Vizio, a large cluster of IPRs (IPR2024-00351 through -00354, -00694, -00696, -00699, -00722, -00723, -00300), a November 2025 final written decision in Vizio's IPR2024-00723 holding all challenged claims of the '384 patent unpatentable, and a Federal Circuit dismissal of Multimedia's consolidated appeal (No. 2025-2063) in January 2026. I found no public record of a verdict, settlement, or appeal specifically in the Tubi matter.

PTAB / IPR experience. No IPR or PGR filings could be attributed to this attorney by name; the PTAB activity in the related Multimedia proceedings is captioned to the plaintiff's other counsel (e.g., S. Calvin Capshaw III, Robert Bunt) and to petitioners LG and Vizio. This should be treated as unverified rather than as an absence of PTAB experience.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced and therefore omitted. Web verification for this name did not succeed: searches returned different attorneys sharing the Baucum surname — Don M. Baucum, a San Antonio real-estate practitioner, and Dan Baucum, a Dallas tax lawyer — neither of whom is this attorney. No public profile, bar record, or firm bio for a "D. 'Bo' M. Baucum" at The Dacus Firm was located, so bar admissions, law school, and admission date should be confirmed directly with the firm before being relied on.