Patent litigation attorney
Crena Pacheco
1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
Crena Pacheco is a patent litigation attorney with Fish & Richardson P.C., primarily focusing on proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Her practice involves defending clients as an attorney for petitioners in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.
Pacheco has been involved in several IPR proceedings, demonstrating experience in challenging patent validity. She represented Apple Inc. as the Attorney for Petitioner in Apple Inc. v. Resonant Systems Inc. Additionally, she has appeared in other IPR cases, including representing MOM Enterprises, LLC as Petitioner in a case against Elaine and Reinhold W. Vieth, and DISH Network L.L.C.. These cases indicate her involvement in technology areas such as wireless communication components (Resonant Systems likely relating to resonators) and potentially digital media or content delivery systems (DISH Network). Her work often involves detailed analysis of prior art and claim construction within the PTAB context, as seen in a case concerning "blurring" in an ex parte reexamination.
Prior to Fish & Richardson, Pacheco was also associated with Ropes & Gray LLP, where she appeared in PTAB proceedings, such as a set of IPRs involving U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556 B1, which appears to relate to displaying program information, potentially in the context of television guides.
Crena Pacheco is admitted to the bar and practices from Fish & Richardson's Minneapolis office.Crena Pacheco is a patent litigation attorney at Fish & Richardson P.C., with a primary focus on proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Her practice centers on representing petitioners in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, challenging patent validity.
Ms. Pacheco has significant experience in IPRs across various technology areas. She represented Apple Inc. as the Attorney for Petitioner in Apple Inc. v. Resonant Systems Inc., a case likely involving wireless communication components. Her involvement extends to other IPRs, including representing MOM Enterprises, LLC against Elaine and Reinhold W. Vieth, and DISH Network L.L.C. These cases highlight her work in technology areas such as digital media or content delivery systems, in addition to wireless technologies. Her practice frequently involves in-depth analysis of prior art and claim construction, as evidenced by her engagement in a case concerning "blurring" in an ex parte reexamination.
Before joining Fish & Richardson, Ms. Pacheco was associated with Ropes & Gray LLP, where she also handled PTAB proceedings. For instance, she appeared in a series of IPRs concerning U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556 B1, which appears to relate to the display of program information, potentially within television guides.
Crena Pacheco is admitted to the bar and is based in Fish & Richardson's Minneapolis office.
Firms
Roles
- Attorney for Petitioner1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffApple Inc. v. Resonant Systems Inc.Fish & Richardson · Attorney for Petitioner