Craig Hoovler

Craig Hoovler is a patent litigation attorney associated with RuyakCherian, where he has consistently represented plaintiffs in intellectual property disputes. His experience, as evidenced by tracked cases, indicates a focus on plaintiff-side patent litigation, with all two of his tracked appearances being on behalf of plaintiffs.

Hoovler's practice includes patent litigation related to software and data collection technologies, as seen in the prominent case of Bright Data, Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al.. In this matter, the jury found that the defendants infringed the asserted patents and that the infringement was willful. However, the court ultimately denied Bright Data's motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction. His work for Bright Data, a web data platform, against a proxy network provider, involved U.S. Patent Nos. 10,257,319, 10,484,510, and 10,469,614. He also has a tracked appearance in case 23-2443, also on the plaintiff side.

RuyakCherian (now operating as Cherian Harkins Dunham) is a firm recognized for its patent litigation prowess, with mentions in Legal 500 for Civil Litigation/Class Action: Plaintiffs and U.S. News – Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" for patent litigation. The firm's practice areas include patent appeals, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and USPTO post-grant proceedings. While the firm generally handles post-grant proceedings, specific IPR/PTAB experience for Mr. Hoovler is not individually detailed in available public sources.

Reliably sourced information regarding Craig Hoovler's bar admissions and specific educational background related to his patent litigation practice is not publicly available to verify at this time.