Patent litigation attorney
Corrine Saylor Davis
1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney before writing.
Corrine Saylor Davis — patent litigation practice summary
Note: the tracked record for this attorney is thin — a single appearance — so the profile below leans on her published firm biographies (Greenberg Traurig, current; RuyakCherian LLP, former) and publicly filed court/PTAB documents, with sources flagged where verification is incomplete.
Specialty / focus. Davis's practice centers on patent litigation, with her current firm bio describing a particular focus on computer software and related technologies and experience leading case teams from inception through trial and appeal, plus work on copyright, trade secret, licensing, IP diligence, and freedom-to-operate matters. Her earlier RuyakCherian bio describes a broader technology mix spanning software to medical devices, and the RuyakCherian docket material in which her name appears involves wireless/telecommunications and networking technologies (Carucel Investments wireless appeals; Ameranth wireless-protocol patent appeals) and data-scraping / trade secret disputes (Luminati Networks). I did not find a well-sourced description tying her to pharma, life sciences, or Wi-Fi standards work specifically.
Side preference. On the authoritative tracked data she appears once, on the plaintiff side (1–0), as plaintiff's counsel. That is consistent with the RuyakCherian-era matters: the firm's patent plaintiffs included patent owners such as Carucel Investments and Ameranth. Her current Greenberg Traurig bio is written in neutral terms — representing clients "from startup to Fortune 100 businesses" — and does not establish a defense-side or NPE-specialist identity. Treat the single tracked appearance as too small a sample to support a firm statement about a persistent side preference; the evidence indicates meaningful patent-owner/plaintiff work during the RuyakCherian period rather than a documented NPE practice.
Firm context. Davis is currently a Practice Group Attorney at Greenberg Traurig LLP in Washington, D.C., in the firm's Intellectual Property & Technology group. Before that she was IP counsel in RuyakCherian LLP's Washington, D.C. office, a patent/technology litigation boutique founded in 2015; the tracked case 23-2145 carries RuyakCherian as the firm of record, placing that appearance in her pre-Greenberg Traurig tenure. She has also been listed as a Virginia General District Court certified mediator (2015–present).
Notable cases and outcomes. Her name appears as RuyakCherian counsel in Luminati Networks Ltd. v. BI Science Inc. / code200, UAB (E.D. Tex.) — the data-intelligence trade secret litigation, where filings show her on the plaintiff's team through discovery and a February 2020 settlement — and among counsel of record in a PTAB/ITC-adjacent matter on behalf of the Intex respondents (IPR2018-00875, U.S. Patent 7,346,950). Her firm's prior bios reference appellate work, and RuyakCherian handled Federal Circuit appeals and a Supreme Court cert petition in Ameranth, Inc. matters (a § 101 eligibility dispute). I could not independently confirm the caption, subject matter, or outcome of tracked appeal 23-2145; the number appears in a Fed Circuit Blog listing of a group of related appeals (23-2144–2147, 23-2414–2415, 23-2442–2443), and no public source retrieved in this review identified that appeal as hers by name.
PTAB / IPR experience. Both bios state she advises on inter partes reviews, patent reexamination, and patent-application/petition drafting, and her RuyakCherian email appears on PTAB petition correspondence. There is no public evidence that she regularly serves as lead or backup counsel of record in IPR/PGR proceedings, so IPR experience should be described as part of her practice rather than a documented specialty.
Bar / education. Admitted in the District of Columbia and New York (2010); court admissions listed for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. J.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Law (Certificate in Intellectual Property and Technology Law); B.A., Computer Science, New York University. Her bios do not list U.S. Patent and Trademark Office registration, so her patent prosecution work may have been supervised — this is not confirmed one way or the other. She also appears in Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers "Rising Stars" listings (2014–2018).
Firms
Roles
- plaintiff's counsel1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiff23-2145RuyakCherian · plaintiff's counsel