Patent litigation attorney

Cody S. Lejeune

1 tracked appearance — 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant.

Specialty & background

I'll research this attorney before drafting.

Let me disambiguate the name and check for patent-specific matters and IPR filings.

Summary — Cody S. Lejeune

Identification caveat. The tracked record contains a single appearance for "Cody S. Lejeune," listed as of counsel at "Lejeune & Associates," on the defendant side. Public searching surfaces only Cody R. LeJeune of LeJeune Law, P.C., San Diego — a registered patent attorney. No firm called "Lejeune & Associates" and no "Cody S. Lejeune" could be verified. The middle initial and firm name both differ, so the identification below is offered as the closest publicly documented match and should be treated as unconfirmed rather than established.

Specialty and focus. Assuming that match, the practice is described in firm/profile materials as complex IP and business litigation, with patent work spanning digital rights management, database warehouse appliances, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, smartphones, security systems, Ethernet technologies, digital cameras and scanners, and internet security hardware and software. The same materials list substantial securities-fraud class action work and trademark litigation alongside patents. These technology descriptions are self-reported profile content and could not be corroborated against docket-level patent case data.

Side preference. The tracked data show a single defendant-side appearance and zero plaintiff-side appearances — far too thin a sample to infer a side preference. Publicly available profile material, by contrast, describes plaintiff-side patent enforcement results (including claimed settlements exceeding $15 million against several large digital music companies in the Eastern District of Texas) alongside a defense-side result obtained after serving invalidity contentions in the Southern District of California. Those results are uncorroborated and should be read as the attorney's own characterization, not verified outcomes. Nothing in the record supports characterizing him as an NPE/PAE-focused filer or as a routine defender of operating companies.

Firm context, notable matters, and PTAB. Career history reported in profile materials: principal at LeJeune Law, P.C. (from 2020); partner at Insigne LLP, formerly San Diego IP Law Group (2017–2020); associate at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (2007–2017). The tracked case is untitled in the data set, so no case name or outcome can be reported from it. No confirmed verdicts, Federal Circuit opinions, or IPR/PGR filings were located — his appellate and PTAB practice is asserted in profile materials but I found no PTAB proceeding or Federal Circuit decision naming him. The best-documented litigation appearances are outside patents: a TTAB cancellation as counsel for Southwind Commerce LLC (Craft Clothing LLC v. Southwind Commerce LLC, Canc. No. 92079947, 2023) and service as class counsel in Woulfe v. Universal City Studios LLC (C.D. Cal. No. 2:22-cv-00459), a false-advertising class action concerning a film trailer.

Bar and education. California State Bar No. 249242, active, admitted June 1, 2007 (State Bar of California); registered patent attorney with the USPTO; J.D., Thomas Jefferson School of Law, 2006; B.S. in biology with a chemistry minor, Nicholls State University, 2003. Profile materials additionally claim admission to the Federal Circuit (2010) and several district courts, which I could not independently verify.

Firms

Roles

  • of counsel1

Cases (1)