Clark Gordon

I'll research this attorney's professional background before drafting.

Specialty / focus areas. Clark T. Gordon is a registered patent attorney whose practice centers on patent infringement litigation and PTAB proceedings in electronics- and life-sciences-adjacent technologies. His firm bio describes experience spanning computer hardware and software, display devices, standard-essential technologies (video, Wi-Fi, memory), networking systems, medical devices, and aerospace systems. That is consistent with the matters he is publicly tied to: memory and semiconductor patents (WeCrevention; MR Licensing), networking (Enhanced Data Streaming v. Cisco; Correct Transmission v. Juniper Networks), and bovine-genetics/biotech litigation (Inguran LLC d/b/a STGenetics; XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, D. Colo. 2017).

Side preference. The tracked docket is mixed — one plaintiff-side and two defendant-side appearances. Read alongside his publicly listed matters, however, the emphasis is patent-owner enforcement: he is listed as counsel for plaintiffs WeCrevention, MR Licensing, Enhanced Data Streaming, Smart Speaker, and Correct Transmission. The tracked defendant-side entries reflect postures typical of a patent-owner practice (WeCrevention as patent owner/respondent in Unified Patents, Inc. v. Wecrevention) and earlier defensive work. He has also represented operating companies on defense, including Butterfly Network (against FUJIFILM Sonosite) and Kingston Technology.

Firm context / notable matters. He is Counsel at Fabricant Rubino & Lambrianakos LLP (Irvine, CA; the firm also appears in dockets as Fabricant LLP), a boutique known for patent-owner enforcement campaigns. Before joining, he was counsel at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, where he focused on patent litigation and worked on ITC matters and IPRs (including a Vizio/AMD IPR team). His most prominent current matter is the WeCrevention multi-defendant campaign asserting memory patents against Apple, Dell, and Lenovo in Texas, which has generated related IPRs (e.g., Apple Inc. v. WeCrevention, Inc., IPR2026-00239). Earlier notable matters include Correct Transmission v. Juniper and the Inguran/STGenetics and XY v. Trans Ova Genetics bovine-genetics cases. Verifiable public outcome detail — jury verdicts, Federal Circuit dispositions, or settlement figures — is thin; the firm states his matters produced settlements and licenses "in excess of nine figures," which I could not independently confirm.

PTAB / IPR experience. He appears regularly in PTAB proceedings, on both sides — defending patent owners in WeCrevention-related IPRs and, at Akin Gump, on petitioner-side IPR teams (including Vizio/AMD matters).

Bar / education. Registered USPTO patent practitioner (Reg. No. 74,706); M.S. in engineering mechanics, Columbia University; president of the Orange County Intellectual Property Law Association. State bar admission was not confirmed in the sources reviewed, and his undergraduate/law school credentials were not located.