Cameron W. Westin

I'll research this attorney's background before writing the summary.

Let me dig into the tracked case and notable outcomes.

Let me verify firm status, PTAB outcomes, and the Theragun/Tzumi result.

Cameron W. Westin — patent litigation summary

Specialty / focus. Westin's practice centers on IP and patent litigation with an emphasis on electrical, computer, and semiconductor technologies, according to the firm biography reproduced in legal directories (LawTally, MoreLaw, FindLaw). The bio's listed engagements skew to consumer electronics and computer hardware: 802.11 wireless standards, 3D graphics, graphics processing and display, power adapter interface technology, computer power management, video compression, bus architecture, memory and processor cache, and IP/media-delivery systems, plus mechanical/consumer-device work in the percussive-therapy space. He is also a registered patent practitioner (USPTO Reg. No. 66,188) and the bio describes patent prosecution and portfolio development in semiconductors, digital memory, photonics, and digital imaging — so his work spans both litigation and prosecution, though the searchable record is overwhelmingly litigation- and PTAB-side.

Side preference. The tracked data show a single appearance, on the defendant side as counsel of record (Hyper Ice, Inc. v. Therabody, Inc.), and that reflects the pattern in his broader docket: he primarily defends operating companies — Hulu, Google, Samsung-related matters, and consumer-electronics clients — against infringement claims, including PAE/NPE suits such as Sound View Innovations v. Hulu and Implicit LLC v. Hulu. He is not purely a defense lawyer, however: the Law360 attorney docket shows him on Theragun, Inc. v. Tzumi Electronics LLC (S.D.N.Y.) for Therabody as plaintiff, and in multiple PTAB proceedings he has acted as petitioner against patent owners. Net: defense-oriented, with plaintiff-side and petitioner-side representation as well.

Firm context. He is at O'Melveny & Myers LLP in the Newport Beach, California office, where directory listings and CLE materials describe him as counsel/of counsel. No prior firm history was verifiable from public sources; all docket entries and PTAB filings located for him list O'Melveny.

Notable matters. The most prominent tracked matter is the Hyper Ice, Inc. v. Therabody, Inc. litigation in the Central District of California, where he is part of O'Melveny's defense team (with Brett J. Williamson, Marc J. Pensabene, Bradley M. Berg, and others) for Therabody in a multi-case, multi-patent dispute over percussive massage and LED therapy devices. Public reporting indicates those Hyperice-filed cases were consolidated for pretrial purposes and that the merits remained pending at the claim-construction stage; no verdict or final merits ruling is documented in the sources reviewed. Other verifiable engagements include Sound View Innovations v. Hulu (C.D. Cal.), VideoShare v. Google (where he appears as a lead pro hac vice attorney for Google), Hulu's patent actions against Rovi/TiVo entities, and the Theragun v. Tzumi action.

PTAB / IPR experience. Yes — this is a substantial part of his practice. He was lead counsel for petitioner Hulu in CBM2020-00028 (Hulu v. SITO Mobile) and in a seven-petition IPR series against SITO Mobile R&D IP (IPR2021-00158, -00206, -00265, -00298, -00304, -00308 and related), and earlier served as lead counsel for the petitioner in IPR2015-01879 (Comarco Wireless Technologies). He also filed an amicus brief for Hulu on remote source-code review in Canon v. TCL (N.D. Cal.).

Bar / education (firm-bio sourced). Admitted in California, the District of Columbia, and Maryland; registered with the USPTO; admitted before the Federal Circuit and the C.D. Cal. J.D., Duke University (Articles Editor, Duke Law and Technology Review); B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Miami (with honors). These details come from the firm's own biography as republished by directories and were not independently confirmed against bar records.

Note on sourcing: the appearance counts above are authoritative from the structured case list. The broader engagement list rests on Westin's firm biography and Law360's docket summary rather than primary court records for every matter, and no publicly verifiable trial verdict or Federal Circuit decision attributable to him was located.