Brian C. Lomnitzer

I'll research this attorney's professional background before drafting.

Attorney Summary: Brian C. Lomnitzer

Note on source limitations: Web searches for this name did not return a distinct published professional profile (bar listing, firm bio, or court appearance record) for Brian C. Lomnitzer. Results for "Lomnitzer" + patent litigation consistently surface Lorri Lomnitzer, the named principal of The Lomnitzer Law Firm, P.A., and firm-level marketing pages. The two share a surname and firm affiliation; I could not verify any family or professional relationship between them, and nothing below should be read as attributing Lorri Lomnitzer's credentials or experience to Brian Lomnitzer.

Specialty / focus. The single tracked matter, Express Mobile, Inc. v. Google LLC, is software and web-technology patent litigation. Express Mobile's asserted patents (U.S. Nos. 6,546,397, 7,594,168, 9,063,755, 9,471,287, and 9,928,044) claim browser-based website generation tools, run-time engines, and mobile web content presentation systems. That is the only patent matter in the tracked record, so it is the sole data point on technology focus; it does not support broader claims about Wi-Fi, pharma, or mechanical work. Firm-level practice descriptions cover patents, trademarks, and copyrights across technology, consumer products, entertainment, and sports.

Side preference. The record shows 1 plaintiff-side appearance and 0 defendant-side appearances, with the role designated Local Counsel rather than lead merits counsel. This one appearance is a thin basis for characterizing him as plaintiff- or NPE-oriented. Notably, the firm's own litigation page states it represents both patent holders and accused infringers and serves as local counsel to out-of-state plaintiffs and defendants in Florida state and federal courts — so the firm markets a two-sided posture despite the plaintiff-only tracked count. The correct read is that his tracked patent work is plaintiff-side and ancillary (local counsel), not that he is an established NPE-side litigator.

Firm context and notable case. He appears through The Lomnitzer Law Firm, P.A., a South Florida IP and business-litigation boutique headquartered in Boca Raton, with additional offices in Pompano Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach. I found no verified information on prior firms. The one tracked matter, Express Mobile v. Google, was filed in the Western District of Texas (No. 6:20-cv-00804) and later transferred to the Northern District of California (No. 3:21-cv-08944); Express Mobile is an inventor-owned patent assertion entity. The litigation generated significant parallel PTAB activity and two Federal Circuit appeals — 2023-1646 (June 17, 2025, Express Mobile obtained a claim-construction win and remand) and 2024-1190 (Dec. 8, 2025, affirmance of PTAB unpatentability findings on the '755, '287, and '044 patents). Those appellate and PTAB efforts were handled by Kramer Alberti / MoloLamken / Lowenstein & Weatherwax and by Google's Paul Hastings team; I found no indication that the Lomnitzer firm took part in the merits or appellate work, consistent with a local-counsel role.

PTAB / IPR experience. No verified evidence that Brian C. Lomnitzer personally appears in IPR or PGR proceedings; PTAB practice is not attributed to him in any source I located. The firm's website advertises post-grant PTAB experience, but that statement is tied to Lorri Lomnitzer and does not establish his own PTAB docket.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced for Brian C. Lomnitzer; omitted rather than guessed.