Patent litigation attorney
Andrew S. Brown
5 tracked appearances — 4 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney before drafting.
Let me verify the tracked cases and the IPR work.
Andrew S. "Andy" Brown — Of Counsel, Radulescu LLP (New York)
Andrew S. Brown is a registered patent attorney whose practice centers on patent litigation and post-grant proceedings, with a technical focus on LED lighting and optoelectronics. His Radulescu bio notes an electrical engineering background (B.S.E., University of Michigan), and every one of his tracked matters involves LED lighting technology — color-tunable linear LED fixtures, LED chips and electrode/wavelength-conversion architecture, and white-filament bulb design. He does not appear to work in pharma, Wi-Fi/standards, or general software litigation. His practice spans all phases of district court litigation (claim construction, discovery, pretrial) plus Federal Circuit briefing, and he is registered to practice before the USPTO.
Side preference. The tracked data show a tilt toward the patent-owner/plaintiff side — four plaintiff-side versus one defendant-side appearance — but in practice he is genuinely dual-sided. He has asserted patents for patent owners (Jesco Lighting against AGS Lighting Management; Elong against Feit in the IPR caption) and simultaneously defended accused LED products (representing Savant/GE Lighting, Elong, and LEDVANCE against Feit Electric's infringement suits and challenging Feit's patent at the PTAB). Public dockets also place him on plaintiffs' counsel team for Seoul Semiconductor / Seoul Viosys against Feit Electric in C.D. Cal. (No. 2:22-cv-05097), a matter not in the tracked list. So the better characterization is a small-firm litigator who will take either side of an LED patent dispute, with a recurring emphasis on attacking asserted patents at the Board.
Firm context. He is Of Counsel at Radulescu LLP, an IP boutique built around patent litigation and PTAB work for lighting-industry clients; principal David C. Radulescu leads most of the firm's engagements. Before Radulescu, Brown's bio lists associate/counsel roles at Weil, Gotshal & Manges (2008–2011), Paul, Weiss (2011–2015), Wilson Sonsini (2015–2018), Quinn Emanuel (2018–2019), Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi (2021–2022), and Devlin Law Firm (2022–2023). There is no indication he has been in-house.
Notable matters / PTAB. His most significant verified result is the consolidated IPR of Feit Electric's U.S. Patent No. 8,604,678 (white LED filament / wavelength-conversion patent), where he was on the petitioners' counsel team for Savant/GE Lighting and LEDVANCE. The Board instituted review in IPR2024-01357 on March 5, 2025, and on August 28, 2026 issued a Final Written Decision holding all challenged claims unpatentable and denying Feit's contingent motion to amend; the parallel district court cases were stayed. He was also counsel on the follow-on petitions IPR2025-00260 (Director declined discretionary denial — designated informative January 9, 2026) and IPR2025-00258 (joinder petition; Director denied institution in a decision designated precedential January 9, 2026). In the earlier Jesco/AGS dispute, the firm's petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 11,751,302 (IPR2025-01328) was instituted in January 2026, and Jesco moved to dismiss AGS's Delaware complaint. Outcomes in the Seoul Semiconductor/Feit litigation went against his side on at least one discovery ruling (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024, granting in part Feit's motion to strike late-produced documents). His firm bio states he has argued before the PTAB as lead counsel and has been on trial teams that won a complete defense verdict for an accused infringer and a money judgment for a patent owner; the bio does not identify those cases, so those results are not independently verified here. PTAB work is clearly a core part of his practice rather than occasional.
Bar / education. B.S.E. summa cum laude in Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan (2005); J.D., Harvard Law School (2008); admitted in New York and Michigan (Washington, resigned); U.S. Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, S.D.N.Y., E.D.N.Y., W.D. Wash., and USPTO (Reg. No. 74,177).
Note on identification: several attorneys share this name. This profile is built on the Radulescu "Of Counsel" attorney using the address andy@radip.com, which matches the signature and counsel listings in the Feit/Savant docket documents cited above. Verified results are limited to what appears in court and PTAB records and the firm's own bio; no independent reporting was found profiling his individual practice.
Firms
Roles
- back-up counsel2
- of counsel2
- Of Counsel1
Cases (5)
- π plaintiffElong International USA, Inc. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.Radulescu · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantElong International USA, Inc. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.Radulescu · of counsel
- π plaintiffJesco Lighting Group v. AGS Lighting Management, LLCRadulescu · Of Counsel
- π plaintiffSavant Technologies LLC d/b/a GE Lighting et al. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.Radulescu · of counsel
- π plaintiffSavant Technologies LLC et al. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.Radulescu · back-up counsel