Amelia Elizabeth Murray

I'll research this attorney's professional background before drafting.

The first searches returned little. Let me try more targeted queries.

Found a likely match (Amelia E. Murray at Shook, Chicago, appearing in a Delaware patent case and a PTAB petition). Let me verify and gather more.

Note on identity: The tracked name ("Amelia Elizabeth Murray") does not exactly match the only Shook, Hardy & Bacon attorney my searches surfaced — Amelia Emma Murray ("Emma Murray"), an associate in Shook's Chicago office (aemurray@shb.com; 111 S. Wacker Dr.). The tracked docket data (Shook, defendant-side, counsel) and the email/initials strongly suggest these are the same person, but the middle name differs and no standalone bio page under "Amelia Murray" was locatable. The summary below relies on the Emma Murray materials and flags that caveat; it should be re-verified before use.

Specialty / focus areas. The attributable Shook practice description covers complex intellectual property and commercial disputes — patent and trade secret litigation, contract and licensing disputes, and unfair competition — with stated industry experience in software, biotechnology, data transfer, and financial technology. Representative matters listed include a data-transmission patent dispute for a large technology company, Hatch-Waxman/ANDA patent litigation for a pharmaceutical client, and consumer-products patent actions. The one publicly identifiable patent case involving an Amelia E. Murray — PayRange Inc. v. CSC Serviceworks, Inc. (D. Del.) — concerns payment/kiosk technology, consistent with a software-and-electronics rather than life-sciences litigator.

Side preference. The tracked data show 0 plaintiff-side and 2 defendant-side appearances, both as counsel, i.e. an exclusively defense-side patent practice. That is consistent with Shook's defense-oriented IP group and with the identified docket role (defending CSC Serviceworks).

Firm context. Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Chicago office, where she is described in a 2023 court filing as an associate. No prior firm history in patent litigation was located in searchable sources.

Notable cases / PTAB / bar. In PayRange Inc. v. CSC Serviceworks, Inc., No. 1:23-cv-00278 (D. Del.), Murray filed a declaration supporting the defendant's partial motion to dismiss. She also appears as pro hac vice counsel in a PTAB petition filing, and the firm practice description states she handles post-grant proceedings including inter partes review and ex parte reexamination — so PTAB work is indicated, though I could not verify the number or outcomes of specific IPRs. She is licensed in Illinois and was admitted pro hac vice in the Delaware action. Law school and undergraduate education were not reliably sourced and are omitted.

Two caveats worth stating plainly: the two tracked appearances are recorded as untitled cases, so I cannot name them; and because of the name discrepancy, the practice description above may describe the wrong individual if the tracked attorney is a different Amelia Murray.