Patent litigation attorney

Alexander Nedeem Yow

1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.

Specialty & background

I'll research this attorney before drafting.

Let me dig deeper on cases and IPR work.

Let me check the firm's insights page and additional case listings.

Alexander Nedeem Yow — Patent Litigation Practice Summary

Specialty / focus areas. Yow's practice centers on patent litigation and prosecution-side patent work. His firm bio describes his patent litigation practice as focused on medical devices, software, mechanical devices, and electrical/computer technology, supported by a B.S. in chemistry. The publicly verifiable case work skews toward electrical/electromechanical and software/digital-platform technologies: load management and backup power generation (the Cooper patent family asserted in PSLC LLC v. Generac), and digital media/advertising-delivery software (Cogmedia LLC v. Meta Platforms). No pharma or life-sciences litigation appearances were found despite the chemistry background.

Side preference. The available record shows exclusively plaintiff/patent-owner-side representation. The tracked appearance is a single plaintiff-side matter in which he is listed as lead counsel, and every web-verifiable patent matter places him with the patent owner: PSLC LLC v. Generac Power Systems (E.D. Wis. No. 2:24-cv-01270, filed Oct. 2024) and Cogmedia LLC v. Meta Platforms (D. Mass. No. 1:25-cv-12127, filed July 2025), where he appeared pro hac vice for Cogmedia. Both plaintiffs are non-practicing entities — note that the NPE characterization of PSLC appears in Generac's own PTAB briefing as an adversarial allegation, not an adjudicated fact. No defendant-side representations were found.

Firm context. He is at Friedman Suder & Cooke (Fort Worth, Texas), where he began as a law clerk in his final law-school semester and joined as an attorney after graduation. No prior firm history was identified; his career is of short duration (J.D. 2024), so the litigation record is correspondingly thin.

Notable cases and PTAB/IPR experience. The most developed matter is PSLC LLC v. Generac, where he and Dave R. Gunter obtained denial of institution of three Generac IPR petitions (IPR2026-00022, -00023, -00024) on Feb. 3, 2026, per the firm's announcement and PTAB records; the underlying district court case remains pending. He is also lead counsel for the patent owner in Meta Platforms, Inc. v. CogMedia LLC, IPR2026-00248 (U.S. Patent 10,664,141). He does appear before the PTAB, but caution is warranted on "lead counsel" labels in IPR filings: the Board requires a registered practitioner as lead counsel, so that designation may reflect registration status rather than primary case responsibility. No trial verdicts, settlements, or Federal Circuit appeals attributable to him were found.

Bar / education. State Bar of Texas; admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas; registered patent attorney (USPTO Reg. No. 82,236). J.D., Texas A&M University School of Law, 2024 (Intellectual Property Concentration); B.S. Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2021.

Sourcing note: the tracked case list contains only an untitled plaintiff-side entry, so the case inventory above is drawn from firm website content, Law360's attorney page, Justia dockets, and USPTO PTAB filings. Given the small number of appearances, this profile should be read as an early-career snapshot rather than an established practice pattern.

Firms

Roles

  • lead counsel1

Cases (1)