Alec Royka

I'll research this attorney before drafting the summary.

Let me dig deeper into his background, firm history, and PTAB work.

A few gaps remain — the Oblon→Duane Morris→Nixon Peabody firm sequence and the other tracked cases. Let me verify.

Attorney Summary: Alec M. Royka

Focus areas. Royka's practice centers on patent litigation and contested USPTO proceedings, with a technical emphasis on electronics and networking. His firm bio describes experience spanning consumer electronics, software, cloud networking, network security, telecommunications, electrical wiring and componentry, lighting, renewable energy, and data center operations. The tracked matters are consistent with that: streaming-media devices (the Roku/Ioengine dispute), network systems (Network System Technologies v. Qualcomm), wearable/medical-sensor technology (Samsung v. Omni MedSci), and data-center operations (Valtrus v. Digital Realty). Earlier docket activity and bylined ITC commentary (RSCC Wire & Cable v. Prysmian; Section 337 investigations) reflect additional work in cable/wire and import-dispute matters.

Side preference. He is a defense-side litigator. All three tracked appearances are on the defendant side (0 plaintiff, 3 defendant), defending operating companies against infringement claims. There is no indication in the tracked data of plaintiff-side or NPE/PAE representation.

Firm context. Royka's career has moved through several IP-focused firms. Court filings from 2022–2023 list him at Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt (Alexandria, VA), where he appears as counsel for Roku in IOENGINE, LLC v. Roku. An April 2024 Duane Morris press release identifies him as part of that firm's team defending Roku. His current affiliation, per his firm profile and recent dockets, is Nixon Peabody LLP, where he is an associate in the Intellectual Property practice group (Albany, NY). Note: the Oblon-to-Duane Morris-to-Nixon Peabody sequence is documented across these sources, but I could not verify from the available results whether the Oblon and Duane Morris appearances reflect a lateral move, a firm combination, or case-team staffing — treat that transition as unconfirmed.

Notable cases/outcomes. The most prominent tracked matter is IOENGINE, LLC v. Roku Inc. (W.D. Tex., No. 6:21-cv-01296). According to a Duane Morris press release, a weeklong trial before Judge Alan Albright ended in April 2024 with a jury finding that Roku did not infringe either asserted Ioengine patent (U.S. Patent Nos. 10,447,819 and 10,972,584), on a claim in which Ioengine sought $318 million. Royka is also identified in PTAB filings arising from that dispute (e.g., Roku v. IOENGINE, IPR2022-01257 and -01258). The remaining tracked matters — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Omni MedSci, Inc. and Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. Digital Realty Trust — appear in the case list, but I could not verify specific outcomes for either within the available source material.

PTAB / IPR experience. His firm bio states his practice emphasizes inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB, and he appears in PTAB filings connected to the Roku matter. The tracked data alone do not show a high-volume, repeated IPR practice, so the PTAB emphasis rests primarily on his own firm description and the IOENGINE-related filings rather than a large verified docket.

Bar / education. Admitted in the District of Columbia and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; J.D., George Mason University; B.S., University of Maryland. His bio also states he served as a judicial intern for Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

---

Note on sourcing: the practice description, admissions, and education come from his Nixon Peabody profile; the Roku outcome from a Duane Morris press release; the Oblon appearances from court and PTAB transcripts. The Samsung/Omni MedSci and Valtrus/Digital Realty outcomes were not verifiable in the material retrieved and should be confirmed against the dockets before reliance.