Patent litigation attorney
Aaron M. Wiley
1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney before drafting.
Let me dig into the specific firm and case.
Summary — Aaron M. Wiley (Wiley & Wiley)
Scope and sourcing caveat. The tracked record for this attorney is extremely thin: a single appearance, as local counsel, on the plaintiff side in ABC IP LLC, et al. v. Cope (No. 2:26-cv-00033, E.D. Tex., filed Jan. 13, 2026). I was unable to verify a patent litigation practice, a firm named "Wiley & Wiley," or any bar admissions, education, or IPR/PTAB activity for an attorney named Aaron M. Wiley through web sources. There are several Texas- and Alabama-area attorneys named Aaron Wiley (including a Dallas/Kaufman criminal-defense practitioner, Aaron L. Wiley, and an Alabama personal-injury defense attorney, Aaron M. Wiley), and their credentials should not be attributed to this attorney absent confirmation.
Technology focus, based solely on the tracked case. The one matter in the data concerns firearm trigger hardware — plaintiffs ABC IP, LLC and Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. asserted a family of patents (including U.S. Patents 12,038,247; 12,031,784; 12,529,538; 12,578,159; 10,514,223; 11,724,003; 12,036,336; 12,274,807; and 12,636,403) covering forced-reset trigger ("FRT") technology, alongside FRT trademark claims, against individual defendant Christopher Cope. That places the case in mechanical/firearms-component patent territory rather than Wi-Fi standards, pharmaceuticals, or software. This is a single data point and cannot support a broader practice characterization.
Side preference and role. The counts are 1 plaintiff-side, 0 defendant-side, in a local-counsel role. That indicates engagement to provide local representation for a plaintiff patent owner in the Eastern District of Texas — a common arrangement where out-of-district lead counsel handles the substantive case — and does not by itself establish any general preference for asserting patents versus defending operating companies. The matter also involved related, separately filed FRT enforcement litigation (e.g., ABC IP, LLC v. Hoffman, E.D. Tenn.; a Wyoming action against Partisan Triggers), though the record does not show this attorney appearing in those matters.
PTAB/IPR and bar/education. No IPR, PGR, or other PTAB filings attributable to this attorney were identified, and no reliably sourced bar admission or law school information was found. Both should be treated as unverified pending confirmation of identity.
Firms
Roles
- local counsel1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffABC IP LLC, et al. v. CopeWiley & Wiley · local counsel