Counsel registry

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor

12 case appearances — 7 as plaintiff counsel · 5 as defendant counsel.

Generating firm summary with web-search grounding — usually 30-60s. Don’t leave this page.

Attorneys

Roles

local counsel13
Local Counsel6
Counsel1

Cases (12)

π plaintiffAdeia Technologies Inc. et al. v. The Walt Disney Company et al.Stephen B. Brauerman · local counsel
π plaintiffAon Re, Inc. v. Zesty.AI, Inc.Pilar Gabrielle Kraman · Local Counsel
π plaintiffAon Re, Inc. v. Zesty.AI, Inc.Colin Aaron Keith · local counsel
π plaintiffAon Re, Inc. v. Zesty.AI, Inc.Colin Aaron Keith · local counsel
Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC v. VIZIO Inc.Pilar G. Kraman · local counsel
Δ defendantGreenthread, LLC v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.Pilar G. Kraman · local counsel
Δ defendantGuardant Health, Inc. v. Tempus AI, Inc.Pilar G. Kraman · Local Counsel
π plaintiffJanssen et al. v. Bio-TheraAnne Shea Gaza · local counsel
Δ defendantJanssen et al. v. Bio-TheraAnne Shea Gaza · local counsel
π plaintiffUntitled caseAdam W. Poff · Local Counsel
π plaintiffUntitled caseRyan P. Newell · local counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseAnne Shea Gaza · local counsel

Further reading

How to read a patent claim
A patent has a 50-page specification, a fancy abstract, and a row of figures. Lawyers and courts look at none of that. They look at the claims.
Obviousness under § 103
Most patented inventions are combinations of existing ideas. The modern KSR standard makes those combinations easier to attack than they used to be.
What patent litigation actually costs (AIPLA Economic Survey)
It costs a few hundred dollars to file a patent complaint and a median of $1.5M-$3.2M to defend one through trial. That gap isn't a side effect of patent litigation — for a troll, it is the entire business model.
Patent law glossary
Sixty-plus patent-law terms, defined in one or two sentences each, with a link to the deeper article. The universal landing pad when an article uses a term you don't know.
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. (2002)
Narrow your claim during prosecution and you presumptively give up the equivalents in between. The presumption is rebuttable, but in practice the prosecution history is a defendant's gold mine.

All resources →