Counsel registry
The Davis Firm
12 case appearances — 5 as plaintiff counsel · 7 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
The Davis Firm P.C. is an intellectual property litigation boutique headquartered in Longview, Texas, deeply rooted in the Eastern District of Texas, a prominent venue for patent disputes. While centrally focused in East Texas, the firm handles cases across the country, including in Delaware, New Jersey, Florida, Washington, and California. The firm emphasizes its ability to represent both individuals and Fortune 500 companies. Although not categorized in major national rankings like AmLaw or Chambers, The Davis Firm P.C. has received a Tier 2 regional ranking in "Litigation - Intellectual Property" and "Patent Law" in Tyler, TX, by Best Law Firms.
The firm specializes primarily in intellectual property litigation, encompassing patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, and trade dress. Their patent litigation expertise spans a range of technologies, including smartphones and consumer electronics, semiconductor manufacturing and chip design, computer networks, operating systems and application software, database systems, and pharmaceutical drugs, medical devices, and biologics. The firm demonstrates a balanced litigation practice, with experience representing both plaintiffs (5 tracked appearances) and defendants (7 tracked appearances), noting success in recovering substantial sums for plaintiffs and defeating large claims for defendants.
Notable engagements include its involvement in Omni Medsci, Inc. v. Whoop, Inc. in the District of Delaware, where William E. Davis, III served as lead counsel for the plaintiff. The firm also defended Omni MedSci, Inc. against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the Eastern District of Texas, a case that resulted in a dismissal without prejudice for the plaintiff just 44 days after filing, with parties bearing their own costs. The Davis Firm P.C. maintains an active Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice, defending patent owners against inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) petitions, as seen in cases such as Unified Patents PTAB Data v. Omni Medsci Inc. and Unified Patents, Inc. v. Wecrevention Inc..
Key partners in the firm's IP litigation practice include William E. Davis, III, who has appeared in numerous tracked cases, often as lead counsel. Ty Wilson is another prominent attorney, recognized for his focus on intellectual property litigation and participation in jury trials. Rudolph Fink, IV, whose background includes clerkships with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, also plays a significant role in litigating intellectual property and complex commercial matters for the firm.
Attorneys
Roles
- lead counsel4
- local counsel4
- Counsel4
- counsel3
- Lead Counsel2
- of counsel1
- co-lead counsel1
Cases (12)
- π plaintiffAvant Location Technologies LLC v. Fibar Group S.A.William Ellsworth Davis, III · local counsel
- π plaintiffOmni Medsci, Inc. v. Whoop, Inc.William E. Davis, III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. OMNI MEDSCI, INC.Ty William Wilson · Counsel
- Δ defendantSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. OMNI MEDSCI, INC.William Ellsworth Davis, III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Omni Medsci Inc.Ty Wilson · co-lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Omni Medsci Inc.William E. Davis, III · Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents, Inc. v. Wecrevention Inc.Bo Davis · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Sony Corporation of America et al.William E. Davis, III · of counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRudolph Fink, IV · counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseWilliam E. Davis III · local counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseWilliam E. Davis, III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantWHOOP, Inc. v. Omni MedSci, Inc.William E. Davis, III · Lead Counsel