Counsel registry
Scompart Law
1 case appearance — 1 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Based on available public records, Scompart Law appears to be a solo or small boutique law practice. The firm's principal attorney, David J. Scompart, is the only attorney of record in its single tracked patent litigation case. Information regarding the firm's headquarters, additional offices, or rankings in legal directories such as AmLaw or Chambers and Partners is not publicly available, suggesting it is a regional practice focused on specific client needs rather than a large-scale litigation firm.
The firm's patent litigation experience, as documented in public court records, is in the software and e-commerce sector. This is based on its representation of Authentixx LLC in a case concerning a patent for authenticating electronic content to prevent phishing. The technology at issue involves methods for verifying the source of electronic content, such as a web page, through the use of an "authenticity stamp" and "authenticity key".
From the limited data available, Scompart Law has exclusively represented a patent plaintiff. In its only tracked case, the firm served as local counsel for the patent holder, Authentixx LLC, against an operating company, Udemy Inc. This representation suggests a practice open to working with patent assertion entities. There is no public record of the firm defending accused infringers.
The firm's most notable matter is Authentixx LLC v. Udemy Inc., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in April 2026. Details regarding the outcome of this case, such as verdicts or settlements, are not yet publicly available. There is no information in public records to indicate that Scompart Law or its attorneys have a practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or engage in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.
Attorneys
Roles
- local counsel1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffAuthentixx LLC v. Udemy IncDavid J. Scompart · local counsel