Reza & Associates

I'll research this firm before writing the summary.

Let me verify the firm name and the tracked case specifically.

Reza & Associates — Patent Litigation Practice Summary

Note on sourcing: This is a very thin record. The firm appears in only one tracked patent case, and I was unable to locate a US patent-litigation firm of this name with an operating website, Chambers/AmLaw ranking, published office footprint, or attorney headcount. Public search results for "Reza & Associates" return an unrelated Dhaka, Bangladesh construction-consulting firm and several unrelated immigration/personal-injury practices. The observations below are therefore limited to what the case record and the affiliated attorney's public profile support; anything further would be speculation.

Firm overview. The only reliably sourced US legal practitioner matching this entity is S. Mohsin Reza, who is listed publicly as Of Counsel at Greenberg Traurig, LLP in that firm's Northern Virginia (McLean, VA) office — not as the principal of a standalone patent boutique. There is no verifiable evidence that "Reza & Associates" is a BigLaw firm, an IP boutique, or a multi-office regional patent shop. Consistent with the tracked data (one appearance, role "of counsel"), the most supportable characterization is a small or sole-practitioner of-counsel vehicle, or a local-counsel/designation arrangement, rather than an established patent litigation platform. I cannot report an office footprint, attorney count, or revenue figure with any confidence.

IP litigation specialty. Nothing in the public record shows a technology-area concentration for the firm itself. Reza's own published practice description at Greenberg Traurig is financial services and commercial litigation — consumer protection statutes (FCRA, FDCPA, TILA/RESPA, ECOA, TCPA), UCC and banking/mortgage-servicing disputes, privacy and data-breach defense, and automotive supply-chain disputes — with intellectual property litigation experience noted primarily in the Eastern District of Virginia. His bar admissions (Virginia, D.C., Maryland; E.D. Va., W.D. Va., D. Md., E.D. Mich.) point to a Mid-Atlantic litigation practice rather than a national patent docket. Any assertion of a Wi-Fi, pharma, semiconductor, or mechanical patent specialty would be unsupported.

Side preference. Firm-level data shows 1 plaintiff-side appearance and 0 defendant-side appearances, with the single case brought in a plaintiff posture. That is a sample size of one and should not be read as an NPE/PAE prosecution model. Notably, it is the opposite of Reza's documented day-to-day practice, which is defense-oriented (banks, servicers, and corporate defendants). The single plaintiff-side patent entry may reflect case-specific local-counsel or of-counsel retention rather than a strategic plaintiff-side practice.

Notable cases or outcomes. The only tracked matter is DataServe Technologies LLC et al. v. General Motors LLC, in which the firm appeared for the plaintiff with S. Mohsin Reza as of counsel. I could not verify the asserted patents, the technology at issue, or any outcome (verdict, settlement, dismissal, or appeal) for this case through public search. Related automotive-infotainment patent litigation against General Motors in the same period (e.g., Intellectual Ventures I/II LLC v. General Motors, W.D. Tex.) involved 802.11/Wi-Fi and in-vehicle networking specifications, but I have no evidence linking DataServe to that matter and will not assume a connection. No public verdicts, Federal Circuit decisions, or settlements attributable to this firm were found.

PTAB / IPR practice and key partners. I found no evidence of any IPR, PGR, or PTAB practice at this firm, and no public filing statistics that could be cited. On the personnel side, the only name reliably tied to the tracked case is S. Mohsin Reza; no second, third, or fourth IP litigation partner can be identified from the firm site, court records, or industry rankings. Reza's verifiable credentials are: J.D., University of Richmond School of Law (2007, Editor-in-Chief, University of Richmond Law Review); B.A., University of Virginia; clerkship with Judge John F. Anderson, E.D. Va. (2008); and listing in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation (2025–2027, per Best Lawyers and Greenberg Traurig). Those honors are for commercial litigation, not patent litigation.

Bottom line: treat this firm as a negligible patent-litigation footprint on the current record — one plaintiff-side case in an of-counsel capacity, no verifiable IP boutique infrastructure, no IPR activity, and no independently ranked patent practice.