Counsel registry

Parker Justiss

1 case appearance 1 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.

Firm overview

Firm Summary: Parker Justiss, P.C.
Date: 2026-05-12

Parker Justiss, P.C. is an intellectual property boutique law firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The firm presents as a small, specialized practice, with the State Bar of Texas listing its size in the range of 6 to 10 attorneys. Its attorneys emphasize their technical backgrounds as engineers and scientists, focusing on IP procurement and portfolio management for domestic and international clients. Publicly available, reliable rankings from sources such as AmLaw or Chambers were not found for the firm.

The firm's stated expertise covers a range of intellectual property services, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. The professional background of its legal staff suggests a focus on technology areas including software, computer and electrical inventions, HVAC, semiconductors, and inventions related to the oil and gas industry. The firm's website notes that it handles IP litigation, though its primary focus appears to be on IP counseling and prosecution.

The provided case data lists a single appearance on the plaintiff's side. However, this appearance is by attorney Robert C. Bunt, who is a partner at Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C., a separate litigation boutique in Tyler, Texas, known for acting as local counsel in the Eastern District of Texas. The firm named in this summary, Parker Justiss, P.C. of Dallas, is not affiliated with Mr. Bunt's firm. Therefore, based on the authoritative case list, Parker Justiss itself does not have a track record of litigation appearances, and no determination of a side preference can be made.

The single tracked case, Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. VIZIO, Inc., was a patent infringement lawsuit concerning smart television technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas and later transferred to the Central District of California. Mr. Bunt of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth was listed as "of counsel" for the plaintiff, a role consistent with serving as local counsel. The case has involved parallel inter partes review (IPR) proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) initiated by the defendant and other parties. There is no indication that Parker Justiss of Dallas has a significant PTAB or IPR practice. The firm's key attorneys are shareholders Greg H. Parker and Joel Justiss.

Attorneys

Roles

  • of counsel1

Cases (1)