Counsel registry
Dorfman & Dorfman
1 case appearance — 1 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Dorfman & Dorfman is identified in the provided authoritative data as a law firm with one tracked appearance in patent litigation, specifically as Lead Counsel for the plaintiff in ParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al.. The firm's top attorneys listed in connection with this case are M. Scott Dorfman and S. Calvin Dorfman. The ParkerVision case itself, filed in the Western District of Texas in May 2023, involves allegations of patent infringement related to semiconductor technology.
However, comprehensive public information about a law firm named "Dorfman & Dorfman" specializing in patent litigation, or a broader IP litigation practice, is not readily available through standard web searches of legal directories, firm websites, or legal news outlets. General searches for "Dorfman & Dorfman law firm" primarily identify a practice based in Freeport, New York, focusing on personal injury, criminal defense, and general practice matters. Other entities with similar names, such as accounting firms or different law offices, also appear but do not align with patent litigation.
Furthermore, publicly available court documents for ParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al. (Case No. 6:23-cv-00389-ADA) list "DAIGNAULT IYER LLP" as attorneys for Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc., with no "Dorfman & Dorfman" or attorneys named M. Scott Dorfman or S. Calvin Dorfman explicitly appearing as counsel in the provided snippets of filings. The case is ongoing, with a motion to stay pending Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Inter Partes Review (IPR) decisions, expected in November 2025.
Due to the limited public information regarding a "Dorfman & Dorfman" patent litigation practice and the apparent discrepancy in the publicly available counsel information for the referenced case, a detailed professional summary covering firm overview, specific IP litigation technology areas, typical client side preference, other notable outcomes, or a PTAB/IPR practice scale cannot be reliably constructed. No AmLaw or Chambers rankings for a patent litigation firm by this name were reliably sourced.
Attorneys
Roles
- Lead Counsel1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al.M. Scott Dorfman · Lead Counsel