Buono Law Group

I'll research this firm before drafting.

Initial results didn't surface the firm. Let me search more specifically.

The San Diego result is a family law firm — a different entity. Let me dig into the correct firm and the case.

Research caveat up front: I was unable to verify a patent litigation practice for an entity named "Buono Law Group" through public web search. The only firm by that name that surfaces publicly is Buono Law Group, APC, a San Diego family law firm founded in 2014 and led by Angela G. Buono — an entity with no apparent connection to patent litigation, and I have not treated it as the same firm. The profile below rests primarily on the structured case data supplied, and I flag every element I could not independently source.

Firm overview. The record identifies the firm as Buono Law Group, with one tracked litigation appearance and one named attorney, David F. Buono. No headquarters address, city, office footprint, attorney count, revenue figure, or AmLaw/Chambers ranking could be located in public sources, and I decline to supply any by inference. On the available evidence this reads as a very small or solo IP practice rather than a BigLaw firm or a multi-office IP boutique — a single-attorney, single-matter footprint is consistent with a sole practitioner handling patent matters for a specific client, but I cannot confirm that characterization beyond the appearance data.

IP litigation specialty. The firm's entire tracked footprint is a single matter: Intel Corporation v. Greenthread, LLC, which places it in the semiconductor/microelectronics space. I could not locate a firm practice-page description, so I cannot verify whether the practice extends to Wi-Fi/standards-essential patents, pharmaceuticals, software, or mechanical arts. Any claim of a broader technology portfolio would be unsupported.

Side preference. The counts are unambiguous as recorded: 0 plaintiff-side, 1 defendant-side, in a counsel role. In the one tracked case the firm appeared for the defendant, Greenthread, LLC — the patent holder — against Intel as plaintiff, a posture that typically arises in declaratory judgment or validity challenges brought by an operating company. That appearance places the firm on the patent-owner side, which for an entity of Greenthread's profile (a patent-holding company) is generally associated with NPE/PAE-side work rather than the defense of operating companies. I could not verify Greenthread's assertion-entity status or the procedural posture of the case through search, so treat that inference as tentative.

Notable cases and PTAB/IPR practice. The sole matter to call out is Intel Corporation v. Greenthread, LLC, where David F. Buono is listed as counsel for Greenthread. I was unable to verify any outcome — no verdict, settlement, Federal Circuit disposition, or docket detail surfaced in my searches. Likewise, I found no public evidence of an IPR, PGR, or CBM filing practice, and no report supporting any filing volume. Given the single-appearance footprint, there is no basis to describe a PTAB practice of any scale.

Key partners. Only one attorney is reliably sourced: David F. Buono, the firm's sole recorded practitioner and the only attorney tied to the tracked matter. I could not verify additional IP litigation partners, and no partner appears in Chambers, Law360, or AmLaw IP litigation rankings based on my searches. Anything further about the firm's leadership, credentials, or rankings would be speculation, and none is offered here.