Counsel registry

Aziz & Bhatti

1 case appearance — 1 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.

Firm overview

Aziz & Bhatti is an intellectual property litigation practice with a focused presence in patent assertion matters. Publicly available information regarding the firm's overall structure, headquarters, office footprint, or general size (e.g., BigLaw, IP boutique, regional patent shop) is not readily sourced, nor are any AmLaw or Chambers rankings for this specific entity.

The firm's known patent litigation specialty centers on wireless communication standards. Aziz & Bhatti notably represented Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (VCT) as plaintiff in a patent infringement campaign. VCT, identified as a non-practicing entity (NPE), asserted patents related to the IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6) standard, which originated from companies such as NXP Semiconductors, Marvell Technology, Inc., and ZTE Corporation. The firm's involvement in this case highlights an orientation toward representing plaintiffs, specifically NPEs, in patent assertion campaigns.

The most prominent case associated with Aziz & Bhatti is Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. D-Link. This dispute, part of a broader litigation effort by VCT against multiple technology companies for alleged infringement of Wi-Fi 6 patents, concluded in an agreed dismissal.

No specific information regarding Aziz & Bhatti's involvement in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings could be reliably sourced. The firm's key attorneys noted in tracked appearances are Jonathan E. Ruddy and Matthew C. Van Eman, both serving as counsel in the Velocity case.

Attorneys

Roles

  • counsel2

Cases (1)