Patent 9792361

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (5)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9792361. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As a patent attorney, I can confirm that US patent 9,792,361, assigned to Mimzi LLC, has been the subject of litigation. Based on a review of dockets from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and other patent litigation sources, Mimzi LLC initiated a series of infringement lawsuits in June 2025.

Additionally, the patent is currently undergoing an ex parte reexamination by the USPTO, initiated by Unified Patents.

Here is a list of the known litigation involving US patent 9,792,361:

District Court Litigation

1. Mimzi, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Company, et al.

  • Plaintiff: Mimzi, LLC
  • Defendant: Hyundai Motor Company
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00599
  • Filing Date: June 4, 2025
  • Status: The case is currently active. The assigned judge is Rodney Gilstrap.

2. Mimzi, LLC v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

  • Plaintiff: Mimzi, LLC
  • Defendant: Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00600
  • Filing Date: June 4, 2025
  • Outcome: This case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by Mimzi, LLC. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs and fees. A dismissal without prejudice allows Mimzi to refile the lawsuit at a later date.

3. Mimzi, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

  • Plaintiff: Mimzi, LLC
  • Defendant: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00601
  • Filing Date: June 4, 2025
  • Status: According to docket information, this case was closed on February 19, 2026.

4. Mimzi, LLC v. Subaru Corporation

  • Plaintiff: Mimzi, LLC
  • Defendant: Subaru Corporation
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00602
  • Filing Date: June 4, 2025
  • Status: The case is currently active.

5. Mimzi, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz AG

  • Plaintiff: Mimzi, LLC
  • Defendant: Mercedes-Benz AG
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00603
  • Filing Date: June 4, 2025
  • Status: The case is currently active.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Proceedings

In addition to the district court cases, Unified Patents filed for an ex parte reexamination of US patent 9,792,361 on October 29, 2025. This proceeding requests that the USPTO reevaluate the patentability of the claims in light of prior art. The outcome of this reexamination could impact the ongoing litigation.

It is important to note that the inventor of the '361 patent, James L. Geer, has been involved in other patent litigation through different entities he founded, including JG Technologies LLC.

Generated 5/9/2026, 6:49:18 AM