Patent 8083137

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8083137. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Here is a list of known litigation involving US patent 8083137:

  • Case 1:

    • Plaintiff(s): Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC
    • Defendant(s): Capital One Financial Corporation (COFC), Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (COBNA), and Capital One, National Association (CONA)
    • Jurisdiction: Virginia Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 1:13-cv-00740 [cite: US8083137B2 Google Patents legal events "US case filed in Virginia Eastern District Court"]
    • Filing Date: 2013-06-19
    • Outcome or Current Status: The infringement lawsuit against Capital One was dismissed by District Court Judge Anthony Trenga on April 16, 2014.

  • Case 2:

    • Plaintiff(s): (Not explicitly named in the provided information, but the PTAB case was initiated by Unified Patents Inc.)
    • Defendant(s): Niaco Data Mgmt II LLC (owner of US8083137 at the time)
    • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
    • Case Number: CBM2014-00028 [cite: US8083137B2 Google Patents legal events "PTAB case CBM2014-00028 filed (Final Written Decision)"]
    • Filing Date: 2014-04-10 (date of petition)
    • Outcome or Current Status: Claims 1, 5, 12, and 19 were found unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in a Final Written Decision issued on 2015-10-13. This decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) (docketed as 2016-1506 and 2016-1515) on July 13, 2017.

It's also noted that other US cases were filed in Pennsylvania Western District Court (case 2:14-cv-00832 and 2:13-cv-00740), Ohio Southern District Court (case 1:13-cv-00378), North Carolina Western District Court (case 3:13-cv-00358), and New York Southern District Court (case 1:13-cv-05386), and Delaware District Court (case 1:13-cv-01274), but specific plaintiff(s), defendant(s), and outcomes are not detailed for these beyond their filing jurisdiction and case numbers. [cite: US8083137B2 Google Patents legal events "US case filed in Pennsylvania Western District Court", "US case filed in Ohio Southern District Court", "US case filed in North Carolina Western District Court", "US case filed in New York Southern District Court", "US case filed in Delaware District Court"]

Generated 5/29/2026, 8:56:08 PM