Patent 7861260

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (12)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7861260. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • 26-1702Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen

    Defendants: Viant Technology LLC

    The company's service delivers television advertisements to viewers that are targeted based on their online behavior and internet activity.

  • 26-1701Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen

    Defendants: Viant Technology LLC

    The accused service delivers television advertisements to viewers that are targeted based on their internet browsing activity.

  • 26-1699Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen

    Defendants: Viant Technology LLC

    The service delivers television advertisements to people that are specifically chosen for them based on their online behavior and internet browsing history.

  • 26-1687Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen

    Defendants: Viant Technology LLC

    The accused service delivers targeted television advertisements to viewers based on their online behavior and internet activity.

  • 1:26-cv-00089U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareActive

    Defendants: tvScientific, Inc.

  • 1:2025cv00822U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareActive

    Defendants: Adform, Inc.

  • 7:2025cv00246U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasActive

    Defendants: MNTN, Inc.

  • 1:23-cv-00174U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus not detailed

    Defendants: T-Mobile USA, Inc.

  • 1:23-cv-00220U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus not detailed

    Defendants: Verizon Communications, Inc.

  • 6:22-cv-01204U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasSettled

    Defendants: Roku, Inc.

  • 6:22-cv-01205U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasPart of ongoing litigation campaign

    Defendants: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.

  • 6:22-cv-01206U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasPart of ongoing litigation campaign

    Defendants: VIZIO, Inc.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As a patent attorney on April 26, 2026, I can confirm that U.S. Patent No. 7,861,260 has been and continues to be the subject of significant litigation. The patent, assigned to Intent IQ, LLC, has been asserted against numerous major technology and media companies.

Below is a list of known litigation involving this patent.

District Court Litigation:

Case: Intent IQ, LLC v. tvScientific, Inc.

  • Plaintiff: Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: tvScientific, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
  • Case Number: 1:26-cv-00089
  • Filing Date: January 26, 2026
  • Status: Active. This case is notable as it targets the core business of tvScientific, a company in the process of being acquired by Pinterest.

Case: Intent IQ, LLC v. Adform, Inc.

Case: Intent IQ, LLC v. MNTN, Inc.

  • Plaintiff: Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: MNTN, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • Case Number: 7:2025cv00246
  • Filing Date: May 23, 2025
  • Status: Active.

Case: Intent IQ, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al.

  • Plaintiff: Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
  • Case Number: 1:23-cv-00174
  • Status: There is a record of this case, but the current specific status is not detailed in the provided search results.

Case: Intent IQ, LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al.

  • Plaintiff: Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
  • Case Number: 1:23-cv-00220
  • Status: There is a record of this case, but the current specific status is not detailed in the provided search results.

Case: AlmondNet, Inc. & Intent IQ, LLC v. Roku, Inc.

  • Plaintiffs: AlmondNet, Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: Roku, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • Case Number: 6:22-cv-01204
  • Status: This case is part of a broader litigation campaign by Intent IQ. Many of the large defendants like Roku have chosen to settle and take licenses.

Case: AlmondNet, Inc. & Intent IQ, LLC v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.

Case: AlmondNet, Inc. & Intent IQ, LLC v. VIZIO, Inc.

  • Plaintiffs: AlmondNet, Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC
  • Defendant: VIZIO, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • Case Number: 6:22-cv-01206
  • Status: Part of the ongoing litigation campaign by Intent IQ.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceedings:

U.S. Patent 7,861,260 has also been the subject of multiple inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). These proceedings challenge the validity of the patent's claims.

  • Case Number: IPR2024-00421

  • Case Number: IPR2024-00422

    • Petitioners: Viant Technology LLC, FreeWheel Media Inc.
    • Patent Owner: Intent IQ, LLC (listed as Almondnet Inc. in some records)
    • Status: A Final Written Decision was reached, with key dates in 2024 and 2025.
  • Case Number: IPR2024-00423

  • Case Number: IPR2024-00424

  • Case Number: IPR2025-00128

    • Petitioner: To be determined from docket details.
    • Patent Owner: Intent IQ, LLC
    • Status: A Final Written Decision has been issued.
  • Case Number: IPR2025-00129

    • Petitioner: To be determined from docket details.
    • Patent Owner: Intent IQ, LLC
    • Status: A Final Written Decision has been issued.

It is important to note that Intent IQ has been described as a "patent-holding ad tech company" that earns significant revenue from patent litigation. They have had notable success, including a $122 million jury verdict against Amazon and licensing agreements with major companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Samsung. There is also an active legal challenge led by Meta and joined by Roku, arguing that the patents should be invalidated because they cover obvious processes.

Generated 5/3/2026, 9:24:55 PM