Patent 7826350
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Speednic LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
The USPTO ODP API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent as of the most recent ingest. No PTAB activity on file.
Strategic summary
As of today's date, May 27, 2026, there is no PTAB activity on file for US Patent 7,826,350. This means all claims of the patent (claims 1-16) remain untested by AIA trial proceedings.
The absence of PTAB challenges for this patent could imply several things. It might suggest that the patent has not been extensively asserted in litigation, thus not drawing the attention of potential petitioners. Alternatively, it could be that previous assessments by potential challengers concluded that the claims are robust and less susceptible to invalidation under §§ 102 or 103, or that the cost-benefit of an IPR does not favor a petition. Without any PTAB proceedings, there is no estoppel landscape to consider under § 315(e)(2) for this patent.
Recommended next steps
If facing an assertion of US Patent 7,826,350, a defendant should conduct a thorough prior art search and an in-depth analysis of the patent claims to identify potential grounds for an AIA trial (e.g., IPR, PGR, or CBM). The absence of prior PTAB activity means that all claims are currently presumed valid and have not been subjected to the scrutiny of an AIA trial.
Generated 5/27/2026, 7:47:18 PM