Patent 7760733

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Speednic LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 7,760,733 in the USPTO Open Data Portal. A comprehensive web search also did not reveal any active or concluded PTAB proceedings. Therefore, the patent currently has no PTAB activity on file, which means all claims remain untested by an AIA trial.

Strategic summary

As of the current date, all claims of US 7,760,733 are UNTESTED by any AIA trial proceeding. There are no canceled or sustained claims through PTAB review. This means there is no estoppel landscape from prior PTAB decisions that would bar a potential petitioner from raising any ground of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, or 112. The absence of PTAB activity could indicate that the patent has not been heavily asserted in litigation or that prior challenges have not materialized into formal AIA trials. Chelsio Communications, Inc. is an active technology company in high-performance networking and storage solutions, and holds several patents.

Recommended next steps

If facing an assertion of US 7,760,733, a potential defendant has a clear path to pursue an AIA trial (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review, depending on eligibility) without being constrained by prior PTAB decisions. The absence of previous challenges means all prior art grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, and invalidity grounds under 35 U.S.C. § 112, are potentially available. There are no active proceedings or upcoming trial-stage milestones to monitor.

Generated 6/1/2026, 12:47:34 AM