Patent 12026731
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Alpha Modus Corp
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of May 31, 2026, there are no Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) trial proceedings on file for US Patent 12,026,731 at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The USPTO Open Data Portal (ODP) API indicates no AIA trial proceedings for this patent. A web search for recent or unindexed proceedings also did not yield any results. Therefore, all claims of the patent are currently untested by PTAB challenges.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent 12,026,731 remain untested by PTAB proceedings. No claims have been canceled or sustained by the PTAB. This means that for a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the full scope of the patent's claims would need to be addressed in any defense.
Since no PTAB proceedings have occurred, there is no estoppel landscape established under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). Therefore, a potential defendant is not barred from raising any ground of invalidity (e.g., anticipation under § 102 or obviousness under § 103) that they could reasonably have raised in a PTAB petition. There is also no indication of a pattern of PTAB challenges or appeals by the patent owner, Alpha Modus, Corp., concerning this specific patent.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of PTAB activity, a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 12,026,731 should consider a comprehensive prior art search to identify potential grounds for an Inter Partes Review (IPR). While the window for filing IPRs (9 months from the patent's issue date of July 2, 2024) has closed, the lack of previous challenges means the patent has not been "hardened" by PTAB review. Analyzing the patent's claims against discovered prior art could inform settlement strategies or district court litigation defenses.
Generated 5/31/2026, 6:47:27 AM