Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis for US patent 11681614 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 because the provided information, including the "Prior Art section" and the full patent text, does not contain the detailed teachings or full text of the prior art references cited for priority (US9652376B2 and US9229854B1) or any other specific prior art.

To conduct an obviousness analysis, it is necessary to:

1. Understand the scope and elements of the claims of US patent 11681614.
2. Understand the teachings of relevant prior art references.
3. Determine if a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) would have been motivated to combine these teachings to arrive at the claimed invention, with a reasonable expectation of success.

While the "Prior art keywords" (host, memory controller, memory, data, zone) and priority dates are listed, this is insufficient to determine the specific disclosures of the cited patents and thus, I cannot identify combinations of references or explain the motivation to combine them. Without the content of the prior art, any analysis of obviousness would be speculative.