Patent 11048299
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Lepton Computing LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings currently on file or discovered through web search for US Patent 11048299. This indicates that the patent's claims remain untested by the PTAB, offering no pre-adjudicated defensive posture for potential defendants via PTAB challenges.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, no PTAB proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) have been identified for US Patent 11048299. Consequently, all claims (claims 1-15) of US11048299 remain untested by the PTAB. There are no canceled or sustained claims through PTAB trials, and thus no estoppel landscape to consider under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). The absence of PTAB challenges also means there are no discernible patterns of petitioner behavior, patent owner response, or involvement of defensive aggregators like Unified Patents.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of any PTAB activity for US11048299, a defendant currently facing assertion of this patent should consider initiating an Inter Partes Review (IPR) if strong prior art exists. The lack of prior PTAB challenges means that the patent owner has not had to defend its claims before the PTAB, which could be an advantage for a challenger. If an IPR is pursued, focus on identifying robust prior art that was not considered during initial prosecution, especially in light of the patent's priority date of August 10, 2010.
Generated 6/1/2026, 6:48:57 AM