Patent 11048299

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11048299. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As of April 26, 2026, the following litigation involving US Patent 11048299 is known:

  • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00338
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
  • Plaintiff(s): Lepton Computing LLC
  • Defendant(s): While the previously generated section mentions a US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court (case 2:26-cv-00338), the specific defendant for this case is not detailed in the provided search results.
  • Filing Date: The filing date for this specific case is not available in the provided snippets.
  • Outcome or Current Status: The status indicates that the "Family has litigation," with the "First worldwide family litigation filed" and "US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court". However, the specific outcome or current status of case 2:26-cv-00338 is not provided in the available information.

It is noted that Lepton Computing LLC is listed as a plaintiff in patent litigation in general. An article from May 29, 2026, discusses a non-practicing entity (NPE) litigation that was resolved with a full settlement and dismissal of all claims with prejudice, with payment made to Adtran, who was the defendant in that case. This case was initiated in 2020 by an NPE asserting five patents and was transferred to the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in 2021. The terms of that agreement remain confidential. However, this article does not explicitly mention US Patent 11048299 as one of the patents involved in the Adtran case. Therefore, it cannot be definitively stated that the Adtran litigation directly involves patent 11048299.

Generated 6/1/2026, 6:48:58 AM