Patent 11004139
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Monticello Enterprises LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
The USPTO ODP API returns no AIA trial proceedings for US patent 11004139 as of the most recent ingest. A web search for PTAB proceedings related to US patent 11004139 also did not surface any active or past proceedings.
Proceedings overview
There are no PTAB proceedings on file for US patent 11004139. This means the patent's claims have not been challenged in an Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method patent review. From a defendant's perspective, this means the patent has not been subjected to PTAB scrutiny, and its claims have not been evaluated for patentability against prior art in this forum.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 11004139, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to initiate a new AIA trial proceeding (e.g., an IPR) if they wished to challenge the patentability of the claims before the PTAB. The absence of prior PTAB challenges suggests that the patent's claims are untested in this forum, and an IPR could be a viable defensive strategy.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:45:10 PM