Patent 11004139

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (6)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11004139. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 11004139 includes several cases filed in the Western District of Texas. These cases were later consolidated into a lead case. Details for associated appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) were not specifically identified in the provided search results.

Here are the known litigation cases:

  1. Case Number: 6:23-cv-00763

    • Plaintiff(s): Monticello Enterprises LLC
    • Defendant(s): Starbucks Corporation
    • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
    • Filing Date: November 9, 2023
    • Outcome/Current Status: Administratively closed on April 19, 2024, after being consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) into lead case 6:23-cv-753-XR. No merits ruling (i.e., no findings of infringement, validity, or damages) was issued in this specific case. All future litigation activity on the asserted patents against Starbucks will proceed under the lead case number.
  2. Case Number: 6:23-cv-00761

    • Plaintiff(s): Monticello Enterprises LLC
    • Defendant(s): Petco Health & Wellness Company Inc., Petco Animal Supply Stores Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
    • Filing Date: November 9, 2023
    • Outcome/Current Status: Administratively closed on April 19, 2024, pursuant to a consolidation order into the lead case 6:23-cv-753-XR. No merits determination was issued. The litigation continues under the consolidated lead case number.
  3. Case Number: 6:23-cv-00753 (Lead Case)

    • Plaintiff(s): Monticello Enterprises LLC
    • Defendant(s): Bluemercury Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings Inc., Macys.com Inc., Macys Inc. (and presumably Starbucks and Petco via consolidation).
    • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
    • Filing Date: November 7, 2023
    • Outcome/Current Status: The court issued an Order Adopting Report and Recommendation in Part on March 18, 2026, which granted the Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed these consolidated cases. Earlier, on January 21, 2025, the court adopted a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the defendants' motions to dismiss on eligibility grounds without prejudice. The motions to dismiss alleged that all six patents asserted by the plaintiff claimed ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The dismissal on March 18, 2026, was based on the finding that the defendants had an automatic sublicense, precluding the plaintiff's claims.

Regarding the cases filed in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with case numbers 26-1717, 26-1730, and 26-1694, the specific details regarding plaintiffs, defendants, filing dates, and outcomes were not found within the provided search results.

Generated 5/30/2026, 6:45:22 PM