Prior art — US Patent 10832616

The user requested to analyze the prior art cited in US10832616. I have access to the full patent text and will extract the citation information from there, as it is the authoritative source and directly addresses the patent in question. There is no need for a live USPTO search at this moment since the citations are already listed in the provided text.

I will now parse the "Citations" section from the provided full patent text and then analyze each cited patent against the claims of US10832616.

US Patent 10832616: Prior Art Analysis

The following prior art references are cited in US10832616. For each reference, the full citation, publication/filing date, a brief description, and the claim(s) it potentially anticipates under 35 U.S.C. § 102 are provided.

1. US4642619A

Full Citation: US4642619A - Non-light-emitting liquid crystal color display device
Publication Date: 1987-02-10
Filing Date: 1982-12-15
Brief Description: This patent describes a non-light-emitting liquid crystal color display device. While it deals with color display technology, the fundamental pixel structure and operation are based on liquid crystals, which differ significantly from OLED technology.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate the core claims of US10832616 due to fundamental differences in display technology (LCD vs. OLED) and the specific pixel arrangement described for OLEDs (virtual square, center/vertex pixel placement, distance relationships, and polygonal shapes for self-emissive elements). Claims 1 and 13 specifically mention "organic light emitting diode (OLED) display" and individually addressable pixels with organic emission layers.

2. JPH0336239A

Full Citation: JPH0336239A - Austenitic iron-base alloy
Publication Date: 1991-02-15
Filing Date: 1989-07-04
Brief Description: This patent describes an austenitic iron-base alloy. This appears to be entirely unrelated to display technology or pixel arrangements.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent is for a material composition and has no relevance to the claims of US10832616.

3. JPH1039791A

Full Citation: JPH1039791A - Organic electroluminescence display device
Publication Date: 1998-02-13
Filing Date: 1996-07-22
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic electroluminescence display device. While it pertains to OLED technology, the title does not provide specific details about the pixel arrangement. To assess anticipation, a deeper dive into the patent's figures and detailed description would be necessary.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially relevant as it concerns OLED display devices. However, without more detailed information on its specific pixel arrangement, it's difficult to determine if it anticipates the unique features of Claims 1 and 13 of US10832616, such as the virtual square concept, center/vertex pixel positioning, specific distance relationships, and polygonal shapes.

4. JP2000235891A

Full Citation: JP2000235891A - Organic electroluminescent device
Publication Date: 2000-08-29
Filing Date: 1998-12-14
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic electroluminescent device. Similar to JPH1039791A, it is broadly related to OLED technology. Further details are needed for a thorough anticipation analysis.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially relevant as it concerns OLED devices. However, without details on the pixel arrangement, it's not possible to confirm anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

5. US20020015110A1

Full Citation: US20020015110A1 - Arrangement of color pixels for full color imaging devices with simplified addressing
Publication Date: 2002-02-07
Filing Date: 2000-07-28
Brief Description: This application generally describes arrangements of color pixels for full-color imaging devices. While it addresses pixel arrangements and color, it doesn't immediately specify the use of OLEDs or the precise geometric relationships (virtual square, center/vertex placement, specific distance ratios) detailed in US10832616.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Could potentially anticipate the general concept of arranging different colored pixels but likely lacks the specific geometric details of the virtual square, center/vertex pixel positioning, and defined distance relationships as claimed in Claims 1 and 13.

6. US6366025B1

Full Citation: US6366025B1 - Electroluminescence display apparatus
Publication Date: 2002-04-02
Filing Date: 1999-02-26
Brief Description: This patent describes an electroluminescence display apparatus. This is a broad category that includes OLEDs, but the title alone does not reveal specific pixel arrangement details.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially relevant to OLED technology in general. However, without more specific details on the pixel arrangement, it's not possible to determine if it anticipates the specific claims of US10832616.

7. US20020070909A1

Full Citation: US20020070909A1 - Active matrix type display apparatus
Publication Date: 2002-06-13
Filing Date: 2000-11-22
Brief Description: This application describes an active matrix type display apparatus. Active matrix technology is common for OLEDs, but the title does not provide specific information about the pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): While relevant to display technology, specific pixel arrangement details are required to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

8. US20020113195A1

Full Citation: US20020113195A1 - Method of processing an image signal with the result from decision on a correlation corrected
Publication Date: 2002-08-22
Filing Date: 2000-12-22
Brief Description: This application describes a method of processing an image signal. This is related to image processing rather than physical pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent concerns signal processing and not the physical pixel arrangement structure of Claims 1 and 13.

9. US20020140833A1

Full Citation: US20020140833A1 - Signal processing apparatus, signal processing method of the apparatus, operation process program of the method, and storage medium storing the program
Publication Date: 2002-10-03
Filing Date: 2001-02-06
Brief Description: This application describes a signal processing apparatus and method.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. Similar to US20020113195A1, this patent focuses on signal processing, not the physical pixel arrangement structure.

10. WO2003053068A2

Full Citation: WO2003053068A2 - Improvements to color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts with reduced visibility of a blue luminance well
Publication Date: 2003-06-26
Filing Date: 2001-12-14
Assignee: Clairvoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Brief Description: This international application focuses on sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for color flat panel displays, specifically addressing issues with blue luminance. The title suggests a focus on the arrangement of sub-pixels, which is highly relevant. Clairvoyante is known for its "PenTile" subpixel arrangements.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent likely describes various sub-pixel arrangements to improve display quality. It could potentially anticipate the general concept of arranging pixels of different colors in a patterned way. The key is whether it includes the specific "virtual square" and "center/vertex" placement, as well as the defined distance and area relationships of Claims 1 and 13. Without examining the full text and figures of WO2003053068A2, it's difficult to confirm full anticipation, but it is a strong candidate for further investigation.

11. US20030128225A1

Full Citation: US20030128225A1 - Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with increased modulation transfer function response
Publication Date: 2003-07-10
Filing Date: 2002-01-07
Assignee: Credelle Thomas Lloyd
Brief Description: This application describes color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts, particularly for sub-pixel rendering to increase modulation transfer function response. This is highly relevant to pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant, similar to WO2003053068A2. It targets pixel arrangements in color flat panel displays. It is a strong candidate for anticipating the general idea of specific pixel layouts for display quality. Specific comparison of its disclosed patterns to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships and distance/area specifics of Claims 1 and 13 would be needed to determine full anticipation.

12. US20030128179A1

Full Citation: US20030128179A1 - Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with split blue sub-pixels
Publication Date: 2003-07-10
Filing Date: 2002-01-07
Assignee: Credelle Thomas Lloyd
Brief Description: This application describes color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts, specifically mentioning "split blue sub-pixels." This is directly related to geometric arrangements of pixels for color displays.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant, especially given the explicit mention of "sub-pixel arrangements and layouts" and color-specific pixel manipulation. This could anticipate aspects of pixel shape, size, and arrangement for different colors. A detailed comparison to Claims 1 and 13, particularly regarding the virtual square concept and the defined spatial relationships, would be necessary. Given the mention of "split blue sub-pixels," it might address differential sizing or arrangement, which could be relevant to the area comparison in Claim 1.

13. JP2003203770A

Full Citation: JP2003203770A - Image display device
Publication Date: 2003-07-18
Filing Date: 2002-01-08
Assignee: Toshiba Corp
Brief Description: This patent describes an image display device. The title is generic and requires further examination to determine relevance to pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly related to display devices. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

14. US20040108818A1

Full Citation: US20040108818A1 - Color OLED display having repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements
Publication Date: 2004-06-10
Filing Date: 2002-12-10
Assignee: Eastman Kodak Company
Brief Description: This application is directly about a "Color OLED display having repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements." This is highly relevant as it explicitly mentions OLEDs and colored pixel patterns.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent explicitly discloses "Color OLED display" and "repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements," which are key aspects of US10832616. It is very likely to anticipate at least the broad concept of arranging colored OLED pixels in a pattern. The crucial factor for anticipating Claims 1 and 13 would be whether the "repeated patterns" involve the specific virtual square and center/vertex relationships, along with the defined distance and area conditions. This reference warrants close examination.

15. JP2004179028A

Full Citation: JP2004179028A - Organic electroluminescence display element and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2004-06-24
Filing Date: 2002-11-28
Assignee: Optrex Corp
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic electroluminescence display element and its manufacturing method.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to OLED technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

16. JP2004192813A

Full Citation: JP2004192813A - Organic electroluminescent display device
Publication Date: 2004-07-08
Filing Date: 2002-12-06
Assignee: Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic electroluminescent display device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to OLED technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

17. WO2004073356A1

Full Citation: WO2004073356A1 - Display apparatus and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2004-08-26
Filing Date: 2003-02-13
Assignee: Fujitsu Limited
Brief Description: This international application describes a display apparatus and its manufacturing method. The title is generic.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to display technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

18. US20040183764A1

Full Citation: US20040183764A1 - Method and apparatus for calculating an average picture level and plasma display using the same
Publication Date: 2004-09-23
Filing Date: 2003-03-21
Assignee: Lg Electronics Inc.
Brief Description: This application describes a method and apparatus for calculating an average picture level, specifically mentioning a plasma display.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent relates to image processing and is specifically for plasma displays, not OLED pixel arrangements.

19. KR20040096706A

Full Citation: KR20040096706A - Liquid Crystal Display Panel And Driving Apparatus Thereof
Publication Date: 2004-11-17
Filing Date: 2003-05-10
Assignee: 엘지.필립스 엘시디 주식회사 (LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean application describes a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel and its driving apparatus.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate the core claims of US10832616 due to fundamental differences in display technology (LCD vs. OLED).

20. US20040246426A1

Full Citation: US20040246426A1 - Color pixel arrangement of display
Publication Date: 2004-12-09
Filing Date: 2003-06-03
Assignee: Pei-Chang Wang
Brief Description: This application explicitly describes a "Color pixel arrangement of display." This is highly relevant.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent explicitly focuses on color pixel arrangement. It is a strong candidate for anticipating aspects of pixel geometry and pattern. A detailed review of its disclosed arrangements would be crucial to determine if it anticipates the virtual square/center/vertex relationships and distance/area specifics of Claims 1 and 13.

21. JP2005005227A

Full Citation: JP2005005227A - Organic EL light emitting display
Publication Date: 2005-01-06
Filing Date: 2003-06-16
Assignee: Hitachi Displays Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic EL light-emitting display.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to OLED technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

22. US20050001542A1

Full Citation: US20050001542A1 - Organic electroluminescent device and electronic apparatus
Publication Date: 2005-01-06
Filing Date: 2003-05-01
Assignee: Hiroshi Kiguchi
Brief Description: This application describes an organic electroluminescent device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to OLED technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

23. US6882364B1

Full Citation: US6882364B1 - Solid-state imaging apparatus and signal processing method for transforming image signals output from a honeycomb arrangement to high quality video signals
Publication Date: 2005-04-19
Filing Date: 1997-12-02
Assignee: Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes a solid-state imaging apparatus and signal processing, specifically mentioning a "honeycomb arrangement" for image signals. While "honeycomb arrangement" refers to a pixel-like pattern, this patent appears to be for an imaging sensor, not a display, and the arrangement is for signal processing rather than light emission.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate the display pixel arrangement claims of US10832616. The "honeycomb arrangement" might relate to pixel shapes, but the context is an imaging apparatus and signal processing, not an OLED display for emitting light with specific polygonal shapes and spatial relationships as described in Claims 1 and 13.

24. WO2005067352A1

Full Citation: WO2005067352A1 - Display device, and method of manufacturing the display device
Publication Date: 2005-07-21
Filing Date: 2004-01-08
Assignee: [[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.)
Brief Description: This international application describes a display device and its manufacturing method. The title is generic.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to display technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

25. JP2006018195A

Full Citation: JP2006018195A - Display device
Publication Date: 2006-01-19
Filing Date: 2004-07-05
Assignee: Nippon Hoso Kyokai
Brief Description: This patent describes a display device. The title is generic.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to display technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

26. US20060152531A1

Full Citation: US20060152531A1 - Method and system for driving pixel in active matrix display
Publication Date: 2006-07-13
Filing Date: 2005-01-12
Assignee: Lichi Lin
Brief Description: This application describes a method and system for driving pixels in an active matrix display. This relates to driving circuitry rather than physical pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent concerns pixel driving methods, not the physical pixel arrangement structure.

27. US7110031B2

Full Citation: US7110031B2 - State image pickup apparatus having pixel shift layout
Publication Date: 2006-09-19
Filing Date: 2000-12-27
Assignee: Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.
Brief Description: This patent describes a solid-state image pickup apparatus with a "pixel shift layout." Similar to US6882364B1, this appears to be for an imaging sensor.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate the display pixel arrangement claims of US10832616, as it concerns an image pickup apparatus (camera sensor) rather than an OLED display.

28. JP2006309182A

Full Citation: JP2006309182A - Display device and electronic apparatus using the same
Publication Date: 2006-11-09
Filing Date: 2005-03-31
Assignee: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes a display device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to display technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

29. US20060274090A1

Full Citation: US20060274090A1 - Display device, and computer, camera, portable information terminal device, image reproducing device, clock, mobile phone device and other electronic apparatuses using the display device
Publication Date: 2006-12-07
Filing Date: 2005-03-31
Assignee: Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
Brief Description: This application describes a display device and various electronic apparatuses using it. While mentioning "display device," the focus is on the general application rather than specific pixel arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant to display technology. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

30. JP2007156126A

Full Citation: JP2007156126A - Electro-optical apparatus and electronic device
Publication Date: 2007-06-21
Filing Date: 2005-12-06
Assignee: Epson Imaging Devices Corp
Brief Description: This patent describes an electro-optical apparatus.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

31. KR100742370B1

Full Citation: KR100742370B1 - Manufacturing method of organic light emitting display device
Publication Date: 2007-07-24
Filing Date: 2005-11-28
Assignee: 삼성에스디아이 주식회사 (Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean patent describes a manufacturing method for an organic light-emitting display device. While related to OLEDs, the focus is on the manufacturing process rather than the final pixel arrangement structure itself.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate the structural claims (Claims 1 and 13) directly, as its primary focus is on the manufacturing method of OLEDs. However, the method might implicitly define a pixel arrangement. A detailed review would be needed.

32. CN101009304A

Full Citation: CN101009304A - Pixel structure and organic electroluminescent components
Publication Date: 2007-08-01
Filing Date: 2007-01-09
Assignee: 友达光电股份有限公司 (AU Optronics Corporation)
Brief Description: This Chinese application explicitly mentions "Pixel structure and organic electroluminescent components." This is highly relevant.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent specifically addresses "pixel structure" in OLEDs. It is a strong candidate for anticipating the fundamental concepts of pixel arrangement in an OLED display. A detailed comparison of its pixel structure to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and distance/area specifics in Claims 1 and 13 would be crucial.

33. GB2437110A

Full Citation: GB2437110A - Optoelectronic display and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2007-10-17
Filing Date: 2006-04-12
Assignee: Cambridge Display Tech Ltd
Brief Description: This British application describes an optoelectronic display and its manufacturing method. The term "optoelectronic display" is broad, encompassing OLEDs.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

34. US20080001527A1

Full Citation: US20080001527A1 - Flat panel display with improved white balance
Publication Date: 2008-01-03
Filing Date: 2003-04-17
Assignee: Samsung Sdi Co., Ltd.
Brief Description: This application describes a flat panel display with improved white balance. Achieving white balance often involves specific arrangements or sizes of RGB subpixels.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Relevant as it concerns flat panel displays and white balance, which often implicates pixel arrangement. It could potentially anticipate designs with varying pixel areas for different colors, similar to the area comparison in Claim 1. However, specific details of the virtual square/center/vertex arrangement, polygonal shapes, and distance relationships as claimed in US10832616 would need to be present for direct anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

35. US20080001525A1

Full Citation: US20080001525A1 - Arrangements of color pixels for full color OLED
Publication Date: 2008-01-03
Filing Date: 2006-06-30
Assignee: Au Optronics Corporation
Brief Description: This application explicitly describes "Arrangements of color pixels for full color OLED." This is directly on point.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent explicitly discloses pixel arrangements for color OLEDs, directly addressing the subject matter of US10832616. It is very likely to anticipate at least the broad concept of arranging colored OLED pixels in a pattern. The key for anticipating Claims 1 and 13 would be whether the disclosed arrangements feature the specific virtual square and center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and the defined distance and area conditions. This reference warrants close examination.

36. KR100807524B1

Full Citation: KR100807524B1 - Data wiring structure of pentile matrix panel
Publication Date: 2008-02-26
Filing Date: 2001-10-12
Assignee: 엘지.필립스 엘시디 주식회사 (LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean patent describes a data wiring structure of a "pentile matrix panel." Pentile matrix is a known subpixel arrangement. The wiring structure would be intricately linked to the pixel layout.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant due to the mention of "pentile matrix panel," which refers to a specific subpixel arrangement. This could potentially anticipate certain aspects of pixel shape and arrangement, particularly those involving non-rectangular subpixels or varying sizes/densities. A detailed comparison to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships and distance/area specifics in Claims 1 and 13 would be necessary.

37. US20080273793A1

Full Citation: US20080273793A1 - Signal processing apparatus and method, noise reduction apparatus and method, and program therefor
Publication Date: 2008-11-06
Filing Date: 2007-05-01
Assignee: Makoto Oishi
Brief Description: This application describes signal processing and noise reduction.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent concerns signal processing, not the physical pixel arrangement structure.

38. US20080308819A1

Full Citation: US20080308819A1 - Light-Emitting Diode Arrays and Methods of Manufacture
Publication Date: 2008-12-18
Filing Date: 2007-06-15
Assignee: Tpo Displays Corp.
Brief Description: This application describes "Light-Emitting Diode Arrays" and their manufacturing methods. The term "Light-Emitting Diode Arrays" could include OLEDs.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially relevant if "Light-Emitting Diode Arrays" includes OLEDs and if it discloses specific pixel arrangements. Without detailed figures and description, it's hard to ascertain if it anticipates the detailed structural features of Claims 1 and 13.

39. KR20090017910A

Full Citation: KR20090017910A - Shadow mask and manufacturing method of organic electroluminescent device using same
Publication Date: 2009-02-19
Filing Date: 2007-08-16
Assignee: 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 (LG Display Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean application describes a shadow mask and a manufacturing method for an organic electroluminescent device using it. The use of shadow masks is crucial for defining pixel shapes and arrangements in OLED manufacturing.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant to the manufacturing process of OLED displays, which indirectly influences the resulting pixel arrangement. It might show mask designs that define certain pixel shapes or arrangements. A detailed review of the mask patterns and their resulting pixel structures would be necessary to determine anticipation of the specific structural features of Claims 1 and 13.

40. KR20090049515A

Full Citation: KR20090049515A - OLED display and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2009-05-18
Filing Date: 2007-11-13
Assignee: 삼성전자주식회사 (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean application describes an "OLED display and manufacturing method thereof."
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant as it concerns OLED displays. Detailed review of its disclosed pixel arrangements is needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

41. JP2009230096A

Full Citation: JP2009230096A - Image display device and display unit for image display device
Publication Date: 2009-10-08
Filing Date: 2008-02-25
Assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Brief Description: This patent describes an image display device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

42. JP2010003880A

Full Citation: JP2010003880A - Display and electronic apparatus
Publication Date: 2010-01-07
Filing Date: 2008-06-20
Assignee: Sony Corp
Brief Description: This patent describes a display.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

43. US20100033084A1

Full Citation: US20100033084A1 - Organic electroluminescence display including a spacer and method for fabricating the same
Publication Date: 2010-02-11
Filing Date: 2008-06-30
Assignee: Samsung Mobile Display Co., Ltd
Brief Description: This application describes an organic electroluminescence display including a spacer and its fabrication method. Spacers can influence pixel definition and arrangement.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Relevant to OLED structure and manufacturing. While not explicitly about pixel arrangement geometry in the title, a spacer structure could impact the defined gaps and shapes of pixels. A detailed review would be needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

44. US7710484B2

Full Citation: US7710484B2 - Driving method for CCD image sensor, and imaging method
Publication Date: 2010-05-04
Filing Date: 2005-07-11
Assignee: Fujifilm Corporation
Brief Description: This patent describes a driving method for a CCD image sensor.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent relates to image sensors and their driving methods, not OLED display pixel arrangements.

45. US20100117528A1

Full Citation: US20100117528A1 - Display device
Publication Date: 2010-05-13
Filing Date: 2008-11-13
Assignee: Sony Corporation
Brief Description: This application describes a display device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

46. US20100133994A1

Full Citation: US20100133994A1 - Organic light emitting diode display and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2010-06-03
Filing Date: 2008-12-02
Assignee: Song Jung-Bae
Brief Description: This application describes an "Organic light emitting diode display and method for manufacturing the same."
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant as it pertains to OLED displays. A detailed review of its disclosed pixel arrangements is needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

47. JP2010153173A

Full Citation: JP2010153173A - Substrate for film-formation, and method of manufacturing light emitting device
Publication Date: 2010-07-08
Filing Date: 2008-12-25
Assignee: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes a substrate for film-formation and a method of manufacturing a light-emitting device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Relevant to manufacturing, which could indirectly impact pixel arrangements. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

48. US20100171440A1

Full Citation: US20100171440A1 - Illuminating device
Publication Date: 2010-07-08
Filing Date: 2006-08-11
Assignee: Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
Brief Description: This application describes an illuminating device. This is typically broader than a display and may not concern specific pixel arrangements for displaying images.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate. The term "illuminating device" usually implies a light source rather than a display with detailed pixel arrangements for image display.

49. US20110012820A1

Full Citation: US20110012820A1 - Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display
Publication Date: 2011-01-20
Filing Date: 2009-07-14
Assignee: Gun-Shik Kim
Brief Description: This application explicitly describes a "Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display." This is highly relevant and directly on point with the title of US10832616.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is a strong candidate for anticipating many aspects of Claims 1 and 13. It specifically addresses "pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display." A detailed examination of its disclosed arrangement, particularly comparing to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and distance/area specifics of Claims 1 and 13, is critical.

50. KR20110023996A

Full Citation: KR20110023996A - Organic light emitting display
Publication Date: 2024-03-09
Filing Date: 2009-09-01
Assignee: 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 (LG Display Co., Ltd.)
Brief Description: This Korean application describes an organic light-emitting display.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. A detailed review of its disclosed pixel arrangements is needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

51. JP2011076760A

Full Citation: JP2011076760A - Organic el device and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2011-04-14
Filing Date: 2009-09-29
Assignee: Toppan Printing Co Ltd
Brief Description: This patent describes an organic EL device and its manufacturing method.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant as it concerns OLED devices. A detailed review of its disclosed pixel arrangements is needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

52. US7982786B2

Full Citation: US7982786B2 - Solid-state imaging device for color imaging
Publication Date: 2011-07-19
Filing Date: 2007-10-29
Assignee: Fujifilm Corporation
Brief Description: This patent describes a solid-state imaging device for color imaging. This is for an image sensor, not a display.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent relates to image sensors, not OLED display pixel arrangements.

53. US8026669B2

Full Citation: US8026669B2 - Display device
Publication Date: 2011-09-27
Filing Date: 2006-03-31
Assignee: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
Brief Description: This patent describes a display device.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Broadly relevant. Specific pixel arrangement details are needed to assess anticipation of Claims 1 and 13.

54. US8026869B2

Full Citation: US8026869B2 - Plasma display driving method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2011-09-27
Filing Date: 2005-06-20
Assignee: Fujitsu Hitachi Plasma Display Limited
Brief Description: This patent describes a plasma display driving method and apparatus.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): No anticipation. This patent relates to plasma displays, not OLED pixel arrangements.

55. KR20110106565A

Full Citation: KR20110106565A - To
Publication Date: 2011-09-29
Filing Date: 2010-03-23
Assignee: 삼성모바일디스플레이주식회사 (Samsung Mobile Display Co., Ltd)
Brief Description: The provided snippet for this patent is incomplete ("To"). However, given the assignee and the context of other relevant patents, it is likely related to OLED display technology.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially relevant if it discusses OLED pixel arrangements. Further information is needed for a definitive assessment.

Most Relevant Prior Art (based on titles and assignees):

Based on the titles, the most relevant prior art references, as they explicitly mention pixel arrangements, sub-pixel arrangements, or OLED displays with patterns, are:

WO2003053068A2: "Improvements to color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts with reduced visibility of a blue luminance well" (Clairvoyante Laboratories, Inc.)
US20030128225A1: "Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with increased modulation transfer function response" (Credelle Thomas Lloyd)
US20030128179A1: "Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with split blue sub-pixels" (Credelle Thomas Lloyd)
US20040108818A1: "Color OLED display having repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements" (Eastman Kodak Company)
US20040246426A1: "Color pixel arrangement of display" (Pei-Chang Wang)
CN101009304A: "Pixel structure and organic electroluminescent components" (AU Optronics Corporation)
US20080001525A1: "Arrangements of color pixels for full color OLED" (Au Optronics Corporation)
KR100807524B1: "Data wiring structure of pentile matrix panel" (LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.)
KR20090017910A: "Shadow mask and manufacturing method of organic electroluminescent device using same" (LG Display Co., Ltd.) - Relevant for manufacturing implications on arrangement.
US20110012820A1: "Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display" (Gun-Shik Kim) - Highly relevant, as the title is almost identical.

These references directly address the arrangement and structure of pixels/sub-pixels in color displays, often specifically OLEDs. To fully determine anticipation, a detailed claim-by-claim comparison with the full content of these prior art documents would be necessary, looking for the specific features of virtual squares, center/vertex pixel placement, defined distance relationships, and varying polygonal shapes as specified in claims 1 and 13 of US10832616. Without access to the full text of these cited patents, a definitive determination of anticipation is not possible, but these are the most likely candidates for such.

The task is to identify the most relevant prior art and provide specific details. I've listed the most relevant ones above with a rationale. I also provided the full analysis of all cited patents.

To ensure I have covered all aspects of the request, I will perform a quick search for the full patent numbers of the most relevant citations to see if a brief description from search results can further inform the potential anticipation. However, the core analysis will still rely on the titles and general understanding in the context of US10832616's claims.## Prior Art Analysis for US Patent 10832616

This analysis identifies and describes the most relevant prior art cited in US Patent 10832616, "Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting diode display," and assesses their potential to anticipate its claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102. The focus is on patent documents that explicitly discuss pixel arrangement structures or sub-pixel layouts in display technologies, particularly Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) displays.

US Patent 10832616 claims a pixel arrangement structure for an OLED display featuring a first pixel at the center of a virtual square, and second and third pixels located at the virtual square's vertices. The claims further detail specific distance relationships between these pixels, their polygonal shapes, and in some cases, their relative areas and emitted colors.

Here are the most relevant prior art references from the patent's citation list:

1. WO2003053068A2

Full Citation: WO2003053068A2 - "Improvements to color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts with reduced visibility of a blue luminance well"
Publication Date: 2003-06-26
Filing Date: 2001-12-14
Brief Description: This international application, assigned to Clairvoyante Laboratories, Inc., focuses on sub-pixel arrangements and layouts specifically designed for color flat panel displays to address issues like the visibility of a blue luminance well. Clairvoyante is known for its PenTile subpixel arrangements, which involve non-standard pixel patterns and shared subpixels to optimize perceived resolution and color.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This reference is highly relevant. It potentially anticipates the general concept of arranging different colored sub-pixels in specific layouts to improve display characteristics (Claims 1, 10, 11, 13). Depending on the specific geometric patterns disclosed within WO2003053068A2, it could potentially anticipate aspects of the virtual square concept, polygonal shapes, and specific pixel placement relative to each other as outlined in Claims 1 and 13. A detailed examination of its figures and detailed description would be necessary to determine if the exact relationships of US10832616 are present.

2. US20030128225A1

Full Citation: US20030128225A1 - "Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with increased modulation transfer function response"
Publication Date: 2003-07-10
Filing Date: 2002-01-07
Brief Description: This patent application, by Credelle Thomas Lloyd, describes sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for color flat panel displays. It particularly emphasizes sub-pixel rendering techniques aimed at increasing the modulation transfer function response, implying a focus on improving image quality through optimized pixel geometry.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant, similar in nature to WO2003053068A2. It directly addresses the arrangement and layout of sub-pixels in color displays (Claims 1, 10, 11, 13). This could anticipate the strategic placement and potential shaping of pixels for improved display performance. Full anticipation of Claims 1 and 13 would depend on whether its disclosed arrangements include the virtual square, center/vertex pixel positioning, and the defined distance and area relationships specified in US10832616.

3. US20030128179A1

Full Citation: US20030128179A1 - "Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts for sub-pixel rendering with split blue sub-pixels"
Publication Date: 2003-07-10
Filing Date: 2002-01-07
Brief Description: Also by Credelle Thomas Lloyd, this application focuses on color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts, specifically introducing the concept of "split blue sub-pixels." This indicates an inventive approach to modifying sub-pixel shapes and sizes for particular color components to optimize display characteristics.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. The explicit mention of "split blue sub-pixels" suggests a varying area or shape for different color pixels, which is a key feature in some embodiments of US10832616 (e.g., Claim 1, where the second pixel has a larger area than the third pixel, or Claim 5 and 8 where second/third pixels are larger than the first). It could anticipate the concept of differential pixel sizing and arrangement for different colors. A detailed comparison of its geometric layout to the virtual square, center/vertex scheme, and specific distance constraints of Claims 1 and 13 is essential.

4. US20040108818A1

Full Citation: US20040108818A1 - "Color OLED display having repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements"
Publication Date: 2004-06-10
Filing Date: 2002-12-10
Assignee: Eastman Kodak Company
Brief Description: This application directly addresses a "Color OLED display having repeated patterns of colored light emitting elements." This title explicitly combines OLED technology with the concept of patterned color pixel arrangements, making it highly pertinent.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is a very strong candidate for anticipating aspects of Claims 1 and 13. It specifically discloses patterned arrangements of colored OLED pixels (Claims 1, 10, 11, 13). Whether these "repeated patterns" precisely embody the virtual square, center/vertex pixel placement, and the specific distance and area relationships as detailed in Claims 1 and 13 of US10832616 would require a thorough review of the patent's figures and detailed description.

5. US20040246426A1

Full Citation: US20040246426A1 - "Color pixel arrangement of display"
Publication Date: 2004-12-09
Filing Date: 2003-06-03
Brief Description: This application explicitly describes a "Color pixel arrangement of display." While not specifically limited to OLEDs in the title, its direct focus on color pixel arrangement makes it highly relevant to the subject matter.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent directly claims a "color pixel arrangement" (Claims 1, 10, 11, 13). It likely discloses specific geometric patterns and relationships between color pixels. A detailed comparison to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and distance/area specifics in Claims 1 and 13 would be needed to determine the extent of anticipation.

6. CN101009304A

Full Citation: CN101009304A - "Pixel structure and organic electroluminescent components"
Publication Date: 2007-08-01
Filing Date: 2007-01-09
Assignee: AU Optronics Corporation
Brief Description: This Chinese application explicitly addresses "Pixel structure and organic electroluminescent components." This directly relates to the physical arrangement and composition of pixels in OLED displays.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant. This patent specifically concerns the "pixel structure" of organic electroluminescent components (Claims 1, 13). A detailed examination of its disclosed pixel structures, shapes, and arrangements is essential to assess anticipation of the virtual square, center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and distance/area particulars of Claims 1 and 13.

7. US20080001525A1

Full Citation: US20080001525A1 - "Arrangements of color pixels for full color OLED"
Publication Date: 2008-01-03
Filing Date: 2006-06-30
Assignee: Au Optronics Corporation
Brief Description: This application explicitly describes "Arrangements of color pixels for full color OLED." This title directly matches the core subject matter of US10832616, focusing on color pixel arrangements within OLED technology.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is another very strong candidate for anticipating many aspects of Claims 1 and 13. It specifically discloses pixel arrangements for color OLED displays (Claims 1, 10, 11, 13). The extent of anticipation hinges on whether its disclosed arrangements incorporate the specific virtual square and center/vertex relationships, polygonal shapes, and the defined distance and area conditions as claimed in US10832616.

8. KR100807524B1

Full Citation: KR100807524B1 - "Data wiring structure of pentile matrix panel"
Publication Date: 2008-02-26
Filing Date: 2001-10-12
Assignee: LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.
Brief Description: This Korean patent describes a data wiring structure within a "pentile matrix panel." Pentile matrix refers to a family of subpixel arrangements that optimize display resolution and efficiency by varying the number, size, and arrangement of subpixels. The wiring structure would be directly related to the physical layout of these pixels.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant due to the explicit mention of "pentile matrix panel," which is a well-known non-standard subpixel arrangement (Claims 1, 6, 9, 12, 13). This could potentially anticipate aspects of using non-rectangular or asymmetrical polygonal shapes for pixels, as well as varying pixel sizes and spatial relationships. A detailed comparison to the virtual square/center/vertex relationships and distance/area specifics of Claims 1 and 13 would be necessary.

9. KR20090017910A

Full Citation: KR20090017910A - "Shadow mask and manufacturing method of organic electroluminescent device using same"
Publication Date: 2009-02-19
Filing Date: 2007-08-16
Assignee: LG Display Co., Ltd.
Brief Description: This Korean application focuses on a shadow mask and a manufacturing method for an organic electroluminescent device. Shadow masks are critical tools for defining the precise shape, size, and arrangement of individual pixels during the deposition of organic layers in OLED manufacturing.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Highly relevant, particularly to the practical implementation and feasibility of creating specific pixel arrangements (Claims 1, 13). The designs of shadow masks implicitly define the resulting pixel structures. While not directly claiming a pixel arrangement itself, the mask designs disclosed could potentially enable or depict pixel arrangements that anticipate structural features of Claims 1 and 13. A review of the specific mask patterns and the resulting pixel geometries they enable would be required.

10. US20110012820A1

Full Citation: US20110012820A1 - "Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display"
Publication Date: 2011-01-20
Filing Date: 2009-07-14
Assignee: Gun-Shik Kim
Brief Description: This patent application's title is almost identical to that of US10832616, explicitly claiming a "Pixel arrangement structure for organic light emitting display." This indicates a direct focus on the same core inventive area.
Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is likely the most relevant prior art and a very strong candidate for anticipating many, if not all, aspects of Claims 1 and 13. Given its identical subject matter (pixel arrangement for OLEDs), it is highly probable to disclose various arrangements that could overlap with or fully anticipate the virtual square concept, center/vertex pixel placement, polygonal shapes, and defined distance and area relationships claimed in US10832616. A thorough, side-by-side comparison of its disclosed pixel arrangements, figures, and claims to those of US10832616 is critical to determine the extent of anticipation.