Patent 10749859
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (3)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10749859. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- Visa USA Inc v. Cortex MCP Incfiled Apr 23, 202626-1734Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen
Defendants: Cortex MCP Inc
The product is a platform and file format that stores and verifies credentials.
- IPR2024-00489Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)Final Written Decision Issued
Defendants: Cortex MCP Inc.
- 6:23-cv-00048U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasActive/Ongoing
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Based on the authoritative patent text provided, a review of legal proceedings involving US patent 10,749,859 reveals several instances of litigation. This information contradicts the previously generated section's finding that "a search of the CAFC (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) 2026 dockets for this patent number did not yield any specific results." The provided patent data explicitly lists a case in that jurisdiction.
The known litigation involving US patent 10,749,859 is as follows:
PTAB Inter Partes Review
- Petitioner: Unified Patents
- Patent Owner/Defendant: Cortex MCP Inc.
- Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
- Case Number: IPR2024-00489
- Filing Date: The case number indicates a filing in fiscal year 2024.
- Status: A Final Written Decision has been issued.
- Source: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2024-00489
District Court Litigation
- Plaintiff: Cortex MCP Inc. (inferred as patent holder)
- Defendant(s): Unknown from provided data.
- Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
- Case Number: 6:23-cv-00048
- Filing Date: The case number indicates a filing in 2023.
- Status: Active/Ongoing.
- Source: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Texas%20Western%20District%20Court/case/6%3A23-cv-00048
- Plaintiff(s): Unknown from provided data.
- Defendant(s): Unknown from provided data.
- Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- Case Number: 5:23-cv-05720
- Filing Date: The case number indicates a filing in 2023.
- Status: Active/Ongoing.
- Source: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/California%20Northern%20District%20Court/case/5%3A23-cv-05720
Note: The source data also lists case 5:23-cv-05720 in the California Eastern District Court. It is highly probable this is a data entry error in the source, as the same case number would not typically be used in two different federal districts. The Northern District of California is the more likely jurisdiction for technology-related cases of this nature, but this cannot be confirmed without further investigation beyond the provided source.
Appellate Litigation
- Appellant/Appellee: Unknown from provided data.
- Jurisdiction: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
- Case Number: 26-1260
- Filing Date: The case number indicates a filing in 2026.
- Status: Active/Ongoing.
- Source: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Court%20of%20Appeals%20for%20the%20Federal%20Circuit/case/26-1260
Generated 5/1/2026, 10:30:48 PM