Litigation summary

The initial search results did not provide specific details for the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), and filing dates for the district court cases, nor the petitioners/patent owners for the PTAB cases directly in the snippets. The snippets mainly confirmed that these cases exist and provided some general information about Unified Patents and PTAB trends.

However, the Google Patents page itself, which is authoritative, listed the cases and indicated "Source: District Court" and "Source: Unified Patents PTAB Data". It also mentioned "Unified Patents Litigation Data" and "Unified Patents PTAB Data" are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, and provides direct links to the Unified Patents portal for each case. While I cannot directly browse those links, I can infer that the information on the Google Patents page is from Unified Patents.

Therefore, I will extract the information directly from the provided Google Patents page for US10674432B2, as it serves as the most direct and reliable source given the limitations.

Here's the plan:

1. List each case provided on the Google Patents page for US10674432B2.
2. For each case, extract:
   • Plaintiff(s) (this might be inferred from the context or usually the patent owner in district court infringement cases, or the petitioner in PTAB cases, though explicit names aren't in the snippets, I will state if it is not explicitly provided)
   • Defendant(s) (similar inference)
   • Jurisdiction
   • Case number
   • Filing date (this might be implied by the case number year or explicit if available)
   • Outcome or current status (as stated on the Google Patents page).

Let's re-examine the Google Patents page for specific details regarding plaintiff/defendant and exact filing dates.
The Google Patents page says "Family has litigation" and then lists:

1. US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court

   • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
   • Case Number: 2:24-cv-00691
   • Source: District Court
   • Status: "Critical" - this seems to be a Google Patents internal status, not the legal outcome. It doesn't explicitly name plaintiff/defendant or filing date.

2. US case filed in California Northern District Court

   • Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court
   • Case Number: 5:25-cv-05041
   • Source: District Court
   • Status: (no explicit status or "critical" mentioned, implies active) - doesn't explicitly name plaintiff/defendant or filing date.

3. PTAB case IPR2025-01421 filed (Not Instituted - Procedural)

   • Jurisdiction: PTAB
   • Case Number: IPR2025-01421
   • Status: Not Instituted - Procedural. Doesn't explicitly name petitioner/patent owner or filing date.

4. PTAB case IPR2025-01235 filed (Not Instituted - Procedural)

   • Jurisdiction: PTAB
   • Case Number: IPR2025-01235
   • Status: Not Instituted - Procedural. Doesn't explicitly name petitioner/patent owner or filing date.

5. US case filed in Florida Southern District Court

   • Jurisdiction: Florida Southern District Court
   • Case Number: 1:24-cv-23837
   • Source: District Court
   • Status: (no explicit status or "critical" mentioned, implies active) - doesn't explicitly name plaintiff/defendant or filing date.

6. PTAB case IPR2025-00974 filed (Not Instituted - Procedural)

   • Jurisdiction: PTAB
   • Case Number: IPR2025-00974
   • Status: Not Instituted - Procedural. Doesn't explicitly name petitioner/patent owner or filing date.

The Google Patents page itself does not provide the explicit plaintiff(s), defendant(s), or filing dates directly within the litigation entries, other than the case numbers which imply the filing year (e.g., "2:24-cv-00691" suggests 2024, "5:25-cv-05041" suggests 2025). The patent owner is Telcom Ventures LLC, so it is highly likely that Telcom Ventures LLC is the plaintiff in the district court cases. For PTAB cases, the "Petitioner" field is empty on the Google Patents page, and the status "Not Instituted - Procedural" is provided.

Since my instructions are "If you do not know something with high confidence, say so explicitly rather than fabricating," and I cannot directly parse the content of the linked Unified Patents pages, I will report the information as I found it on the Google Patents page, explicitly stating when plaintiff/defendant or filing date is not directly provided. I will use the current date (April 26, 2026) to interpret "current status".

I will assume Telcom Ventures LLC is the plaintiff for the district court cases, as they are the current assignee. For PTAB cases, "Petitioner" is typically the party challenging the patent, and the "Patent Owner" is Telcom Ventures LLC. The Google Patents page only states "Petitioner:" with no name. I cannot confidently state the petitioners or defendants without directly accessing the case dockets.

Given the direct links to Unified Patents, I will attempt one more search to see if I can find a general "litigation data" page for Telcom Ventures LLC or a more aggregated view that might list these details. This is an attempt to find the information, rather than infer it.The second search provided much more specific information, especially from Mondaq articles. It confirms Telcom Ventures LLC as the plaintiff in the district court cases and provides the defendants and filing dates for at least two of the cases.

Here's the detailed breakdown:

1. US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court

• Plaintiff(s): Telcom Ventures LLC
• Defendant(s): Samsung
• Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
• Case Number: 2:24-cv-00691
• Filing Date: August 2024 (complaint filed)
• Outcome or Current Status: Active. The deadline for Samsung's response was extended to December 8, 2024.

2. US case filed in California Northern District Court

• Plaintiff(s): Telcom Ventures LLC (implied, as the case was transferred from Florida Southern, where Telcom Ventures LLC was the plaintiff against Apple)
• Defendant(s): Apple, Inc. (implied, as transferred from a case against Apple)
• Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court
• Case Number: 5:25-cv-05041
• Filing Date: June 13, 2025 (case opened in this jurisdiction, transferred from Florida Southern)
• Outcome or Current Status: Active. This case was transferred from the Florida Southern District Court case 1:24-cv-23837.

3. PTAB case IPR2025-01421

• Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets. Typically, the petitioner challenging the patent.
• Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets. Typically, the patent owner, Telcom Ventures LLC.
• Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
• Case Number: IPR2025-01421
• Filing Date: Not explicitly stated, but "IPR2025" implies filed in 2025.
• Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

4. PTAB case IPR2025-01235

• Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets.
• Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets.
• Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
• Case Number: IPR2025-01235
• Filing Date: Not explicitly stated, but "IPR2025" implies filed in 2025.
• Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

5. US case filed in Florida Southern District Court

• Plaintiff(s): Telcom Ventures LLC
• Defendant(s): Apple, Inc.
• Jurisdiction: Florida Southern District Court
• Case Number: 1:24-cv-23837
• Filing Date: October 4, 2024
• Outcome or Current Status: Terminated on June 13, 2025, when the case was transferred to the California Northern District Court.

6. PTAB case IPR2025-00974

• Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets.

• Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets.

• Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

• Case Number: IPR2025-00974

• Filing Date: Not explicitly stated, but "IPR2025" implies filed in 2025.

• Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.Known litigation involving US patent 10674432 is as follows:

• Telcom Ventures LLC v. Samsung

  • Plaintiff(s): Telcom Ventures LLC
  • Defendant(s): Samsung
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:24-cv-00691
  • Filing Date: August 2024
  • Outcome or Current Status: Active. Samsung's deadline to respond was extended to December 8, 2024.

• Telcom Ventures LLC v. Apple, Inc.

  • Plaintiff(s): Telcom Ventures LLC
  • Defendant(s): Apple, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (originally); transferred to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • Case Number: 1:24-cv-23837 (Southern District of Florida); 5:25-cv-05041 (Northern District of California)
  • Filing Date: October 4, 2024 (Southern District of Florida); June 13, 2025 (Northern District of California, upon transfer)
  • Outcome or Current Status: The case in the Florida Southern District Court (1:24-cv-23837) was terminated on June 13, 2025, due to its transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (5:25-cv-05041), where it is currently active.

• IPR2025-01421

  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information. (Typically, the Petitioner challenging the patent).
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information. (Typically, the Patent Owner, Telcom Ventures LLC).
  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2025-01421
  • Filing Date: Filed in 2025 (inferred from case number).
  • Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

• IPR2025-01235

  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information.
  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2025-01235
  • Filing Date: Filed in 2025 (inferred from case number).
  • Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

• IPR2025-00974

  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly identified in the provided information.
  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2025-00974
  • Filing Date: Filed in 2025 (inferred from case number).
  • Outcome or Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.