Patent 10311707
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: RICMIC, LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
PTAB proceedings on file
The USPTO ODP API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent as of the most recent ingest. Web search results also do not indicate any Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings filed against US Patent 10311707.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10311707. This means all claims of the patent are currently untested by the PTAB, and the patent's defensive posture for a defendant is that it has not been challenged through AIA trials.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, all claims (1-26) of US10311707 remain untested by any AIA trial proceedings. There are no canceled, sustained, or pending claims from IPR, PGR, or CBM challenges. This implies that the patent owner, Ricmic LLC, has not yet faced a PTAB challenge to the validity of these claims.
The estoppel landscape under § 315(e)(2) is not applicable here, as no AIA trials have been instituted. Therefore, all prior-art grounds remain available for a potential defendant to raise, whether in litigation or in a newly filed AIA trial. There are no discernible patterns of challenges or appeals by the patent owner or petitioners, given the absence of proceedings.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US10311707, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have the full range of invalidity arguments available, including the option to file an IPR. The absence of PTAB challenges for a patent that has been in litigation (as indicated in the provided patent text with US cases filed in Florida Middle District Court and California Southern District Court) can be a signal, though its exact meaning would require further analysis of the litigation history.
Generated 6/24/2026, 6:45:30 AM