Patent 10311707

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

The provided "Prior Art section" of US Patent 10311707 only lists "Prior art keywords" (caregiver, responding, alarm, response, resident) and a "Prior art date" (2012-09-12). It does not include specific patent documents, publications, or other identifiable references that can be used for an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

To perform an obviousness analysis, it is necessary to identify a primary prior art reference that discloses most of the claimed invention and one or more secondary references that disclose the remaining elements. Furthermore, a motivation to combine these specific references, with a reasonable expectation of success, must be articulated from the perspective of a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.

Without concrete prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, journal articles, product descriptions) to analyze and combine, I cannot identify combinations of prior art that would render the claims of US10311707 obvious, nor can I explain the motivation to combine them. Therefore, I am unable to complete this requested analysis with the information provided.

Generated 6/24/2026, 6:45:35 AM