Patent 10020961

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

1 active
Pending
Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Last modified
Jun 2, 2026
Petitioner
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Inventor
Sung Hyuk BYUN

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is currently one active AIA trial proceeding on US patent 10020961. This IPR is in the "Pending" status, meaning no claims have been invalidated or sustained by the PTAB yet. This gives a defendant limited immediate defensive leverage, as the patent's validity is still being challenged.

IPR2026-00322 — Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute ETRI

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2026-03-27
  • Status: Pending. The petition has been filed and is awaiting a decision on institution by the PTAB Director.
  • Judge panel: Not yet publicly assigned as the case is pending institution. The Director of the USPTO now makes the initial determination on whether to institute IPR and PGR trials.
  • Petition grounds: The specific claims challenged and the prior art cited are not detailed in the available public records for the pending status, nor is the statutory basis (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112). However, IPRs generally challenge patentability under § 102 (novelty) and § 103 (obviousness) based on patents or printed publications.
  • Institution decision: Not yet issued. The Director has up to six months from the petition's filing date (March 27, 2026) to decide whether to institute the IPR, making the institution decision deadline around September 27, 2026.
  • Final Written Decision: Not applicable; the proceeding is pending institution.
  • Settlement / termination: Not applicable; the proceeding is pending institution.
  • Appeal: Not applicable; the proceeding is pending institution and no final decision has been rendered.
  • Defensive value: This active IPR indicates that the patent's validity is currently being challenged by Cisco Systems, Inc. If the IPR is instituted and ultimately results in the cancellation of claims, it would significantly weaken the patent owner's position. However, at this stage, no claims have been canceled or confirmed patentable by the PTAB, so its immediate defensive value is limited to the fact that a validity challenge is underway.

Strategic summary

Currently, one Inter Partes Review, IPR2026-00322, is pending against US patent 10020961. All claims of the patent remain untested by a PTAB final written decision. The IPR has been filed by Cisco Systems, Inc., challenging the patentability of claims, though the specific claims and grounds are not yet publicly detailed in the provided data. The proceeding is in its early stages, awaiting a decision on institution from the USPTO Director, which is expected around September 2026.

The estoppel landscape has not yet formed for this patent. If IPR2026-00322 is instituted and proceeds to a final written decision, Cisco (and its privies) would be estopped from asserting invalidity grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in the IPR. For other defendants facing assertion of this patent, all prior-art grounds remain available until a final written decision is issued.

The petitioner, Cisco Systems, Inc., is a large operating company, and their decision to file an IPR suggests they perceive a threat from this patent or are involved in parallel litigation. Unified Patents lists IPR2026-00322 as "High-Tech" and shows Cisco as the petitioner, indicating a proactive defense strategy against what they may consider an invalid patent.

Recommended next steps

As IPR2026-00322 is pending, the primary next step for a defendant would be to monitor its progress closely. The key upcoming milestone is the institution decision, which is due around September 27, 2026. This decision will determine whether the PTAB will proceed with a full review of the challenged claims. Accessing the petition itself (if publicly available through the PTAB E2E system) would provide details on the specific claims challenged and the prior art asserted. If the IPR is instituted, the subsequent milestones would include the patent owner's response, any petitioner reply, an oral hearing, and eventually the Final Written Decision, which is typically due within one year of institution.

Generated 5/29/2026, 5:56:15 PM