Patent 10020961

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

PTAB activity (1)

AIA trial proceedings — IPR, PGR, CBM — filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced directly from the PTAB Trial API.

1 active
  • IPR2026-00322IPRfiled Mar 27, 2026vs. Cisco Systems, Inc.Pending

Cached for 24 hours. Status strings are sourced verbatim from the PTAB API; the colored badge is our heuristic classification.

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10020961. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 10020961 includes the following:

  1. US District Court Case

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00935
    • Plaintiff(s): Not specified in the provided patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text; however, the case number "2:25-cv-00935" suggests a filing in 2025.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Listed as "litigation", implying it is an active or ongoing case.

  2. PTAB Case

    • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
    • Case Number: IPR2026-00322
    • Plaintiff(s) (Petitioner): The patent text indicates "Petitioner: 'Unified Patents PTAB Data'", which refers to data source rather than a specific entity name. The actual petitioner is not explicitly named in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s) (Patent Owner): Not specified in the provided patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text; however, the case number "IPR2026-00322" indicates a filing in 2026.
    • Outcome or Current Status: "Pending".

The precise names of the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) for the District Court case, and the specific petitioner and patent owner for the PTAB case, along with exact filing dates for both, are not explicitly detailed within the provided patent text. Attempts to retrieve these specific details from external search results based on the provided Unified Patents links did not yield the granular information within the returned snippets.

Generated 5/29/2026, 5:56:18 PM