Litigation

Staton Techiya, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.

dismissed

2024-1917

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Filed: 2024-06-06
Terminated: 2024-12-20

Patents at issue (14)

8315400 PTAB: final decision

9270244 PTAB: final decision

9491542 PTAB: final decision

Plaintiffs (1)

π Staton Techiya, LLC

Defendants (2)

Summary

Staton Techiya appealed the district court's final judgment holding the asserted patents unenforceable. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal on December 20, 2024, pursuant to a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

In the news

What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Record id: 10979836-2024-1917 · edit in Admin

Further reading

KSR International v. Teleflex (2007)
Pre-KSR, an obviousness rejection required explicit teaching, suggestion, or motivation in the prior art. Post-KSR, common sense, design needs, and predictable variations all do the work — and most patents don't survive.
District court vs. PTAB: where to fight a patent challenge
Every defendant who actually fights a patent ends up choosing — sometimes implicitly — between district court invalidity, PTAB IPR, or both in parallel. The trade-offs are not symmetric; the choice often determines the case.
Obviousness under § 103
Most patented inventions are combinations of existing ideas. The modern KSR standard makes those combinations easier to attack than they used to be.
The first 30 days after a patent infringement complaint
Most defendants spend the first 30 days reacting. The defendants who do well spend it sequencing — because every move you make in month one shapes the budget, leverage, and exit options for the next two years.
Joint defense groups: economics, formation, and the privilege framework
An NPE sues twenty defendants on one patent. Solo, each faces $3-5M in defense costs. Pooled into a joint defense group, the per-defendant number drops to $200-500K. The economics only work if the privilege framework is set up correctly.

All resources →