Litigation
Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Parus sued its former IP litigation counsel Mintz (including attorneys Renaud and McNamara) for professional negligence. The complaint alleges counsel's failure to properly present and cite antedating evidence in the '431 IPR caused invalidation of the '431 patent claims and reduced Parus's settlement/licensing values.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).