Litigation
In re Pomalyst (pomalidomide) Antitrust Litigation
dismissed; leave to amend soughtPatents at issue (3)
Defendants (2)
Summary
Putative class actions filed beginning September 2023 against Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, and individuals alleging antitrust, consumer-protection, and unjust-enrichment claims relating to the Pomalyst patents, including the '647 family. In March 2025 the court dismissed the complaints, and plaintiffs sought leave to amend.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).