11 known cases. View patent page →
This district court case was filed by HydraFacial LLC against Luvo Medical Technologies, resulting in a consent judgment and permanent injunction against the defendant.
In this district court case, HydraFacial LLC sued Medicreations LLC for infringement, but the court denied HydraFacial's motion for a preliminary injunction due to unreasonable pre-filing and post-filing delay.
HydraFacial LLC and Edge Systems, LLC secured a judgment on the merits against MIRAmedtech SP. Z.O.O. and MIRAmedtech UG, leading to a permanent injunction for infringement of US9550052 and other patents.
Edge Systems LLC (later HydraFacial LLC) filed this suit against Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. HydraFacial moved for summary judgment in November 2022, seeking a ruling that the '052 Patent was not invalid.
HydraFacial LLC sued Aesthetic Management Partners, LLC and others. Litigation resumed with active discovery and settlement discussions after a statutory stay was lifted, and HydraFacial moved for a preliminary injunction.
This district court case by HydraFacial LLC against Sinclair Pharma Limited and others is currently active, as indicated by its listing in related IPR filings.
HydraFacial LLC filed this district court case against BQ Aesthetix & Co LLC, which is currently active according to related IPR filings.
Eunsung Global Corp. challenged HydraFacial LLC's patent at the PTAB. The case settled after the Petitioner successfully argued for institution due to a material error in examination.
Aesthetic Management Partners LLC filed an IPR petition against HydraFacial LLC at the PTAB, which has been instituted and is currently pending.
In this ITC investigation, GoPro, Inc. accused Insta360 of infringement. The ITC found no violation of Section 337 concerning US9550052.
This ITC investigation was terminated without prejudice based upon the withdrawal of the complaint.