9310855

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. (later with Key Patent Innovations Ltd.) asserted US 7,031,870 as part of a seven-patent portfolio against NTT Data Services, LLC and others. This is the lead consolidated case; the '870 patent is listed among the asserted patents in the P.R. 4-3 joint claim construction statement, with Markman held Oct. 14, 2025 and trial calendared for April 2026. Vertiv intervened.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. sued Digital Realty Trust entities in E.D. Tex. on a campaign that included US 7,031,870. The case was dismissed with prejudice by joint motion on Jan. 22, 2025; filing-date sources conflict (Feb. 27, 2024 vs. June 7, 2024).

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Ltd. sued Digital Realty Trust entities in E.D. Tex., with US 7,031,870 part of the campaign portfolio. The case was dismissed with prejudice by joint motion on Jan. 22/23, 2025.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. sued CyrusOne, LLC in E.D. Tex., with US 7,031,870 at issue. The case was dismissed with prejudice by joint motion on Nov. 22, 2024.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Ltd. sued CyrusOne, LLC in E.D. Tex., with US 7,031,870 at issue. The case was dismissed with prejudice by joint motion on Nov. 22, 2024.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. sued Dawn Acquisitions LLC (d/b/a Evoque Data Center Solutions) in E.D. Tex., with US 7,031,870 at issue. A dismissal order is referenced in a PTAB exhibit list, indicating resolution, but the exact disposition date was not confirmed.

Vertiv Corporation filed a declaratory-judgment action against Valtrus Innovations Ltd. seeking declarations of non-infringement/invalidity. The case was consolidated into Lead Case 2:24-cv-00361, and US 7,031,870 is among the patents addressed in the joint claim construction statement.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. sued NTT Data Services, LLC et al. in E.D. Tex.; this became the lead case for consolidated Valtrus actions, with member cases 2:24-cv-00139, -00142, -00259, -00534, and -00535. Vertiv Corporation's declaratory-judgment action was consolidated into this case, and per a PTAB filing the '085 patent was no longer at issue while the lead case remained open.