8667559

Listed in the Stanford NPE Litigation Database under patent 8,667,559. The narrative ties this matter to Kajeet's sibling patent family, not to US 7,881,697 specifically.

Same Stanford NPE Litigation Database listing under patent 8,667,559. The narrative ties this matter to Kajeet's sibling patent family, not to US 7,881,697 specifically.

Same Stanford NPE Litigation Database listing under patent 8,667,559; the W.D. Tex. complaint text cites the '559 Patent throughout. The narrative ties this matter to Kajeet's sibling patent family, not to US 7,881,697 specifically.

Kajeet, Inc. sued Qustodio LLC; the case was related to 2:18-cv-03899 and transferred to Judge Kronstadt. Qustodio moved to dismiss, but Kajeet filed a notice of settlement and joint stipulation to stay deadlines, so the case appears to have settled.

Docket entry in Kajeet's Central District of California campaign; defendant and asserted patent not confirmed in the narrative.

Kajeet, Inc. sued Gryphon Online Safety, Inc. (and NortonLifeLock Inc. per one source). The court denied a Section 101 motion as to US 8,667,559 and US 7,899,438 but granted a motion to dismiss direct/indirect infringement with leave to amend.

Kajeet, Inc. filed suit against JAMF Software, LLC in the Western District of Texas before Judge Albright. Outcome and asserted patents not confirmed.

Kajeet, Inc. sued Impero Solutions Inc. in the Western District of Texas before Judge Albright. The complaint expressly attached Exhibit A - US 8,667,559 and an excerpt from the '559 file history; accused product appears to be Impero EdLink.

Kajeet, Inc. sued NortonLifeLock Inc. in the District of Delaware before Judge Noreika. Exhibits in IPR2022-00001 reference interrogatories/RFAs served on Kajeet in this case; outcome not confirmed.

Kajeet, Inc. filed suit against CyberReef Solutions, Inc. in the District of Delaware before Judge Noreika. The narrative does not confirm outcome or additional asserted patents.

Kajeet, Inc. sued Trend Micro Inc. in the Waco Division, asserting the '559 patent. The venue transfer motion was denied; the dispute later appears to have resolved in connection with IPR2023-00178's settlement. Accused products included Trend Micro Premium Security Suite, Maximum Security, Internet Security, and Mobile Security.

Kajeet, Inc. filed suit against Infoweise Pty., Ltd. in the Western District of Texas before Judge Albright. Outcome and asserted patents not confirmed.

NortonLifeLock Inc. (now Gen Digital Inc.) petitioned for inter partes review of Kajeet, Inc.'s US 8,667,559, challenging claims 1-2, 5-15, 18-21, and 27-29 on obviousness grounds. A Final Written Decision was reached; Kajeet filed a Revised Motion to Amend (reply filed 2023-01-26), but the precise FWD result is not confirmed in the narrative.

Trend Micro Inc. petitioned for inter partes review against Kajeet, Inc. regarding claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 27, and 33, likely of US 8,667,559 but the patent number was not confirmed in the source. The Board instituted on 2023-05-12 and terminated the proceeding by settlement on 2023-09-01.

Trend Micro Inc. petitioned for a writ of mandamus seeking transfer of Kajeet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Inc., 6:21-cv-00389, to the Northern District of California. The Federal Circuit denied the petition in a nonprecedential decision.

Kajeet filed suit against Liminex d/b/a GoGuardian in the Central District of California, asserting U.S. 8,712,371 and U.S. 8,667,559. A notice of settlement was filed April 9, 2018, and the court set an Order to Show Cause regarding settlement; the narrative did not confirm the final dismissal entry.