4 known cases. View patent page →
The court found the asserted patent claims were directed to an abstract idea and lacked an inventive concept. The court declared the case "exceptional" and ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant's attorney's fees.
The defendant filed a motion arguing the patent was invalid under Alice v. CLS Bank, after which the case was dismissed.
The defendant filed a motion to dismiss arguing the patent was invalid under Alice. Following the motion, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit.
This was an inter partes review (IPR) where the PTAB instituted a trial to review the patentability of the '207 patent's claims. The proceedings were terminated following a settlement between the parties.