Litigation involving US Patent 6092896

6092896

Cases

Active

3 closed

Filed

—

Top venue

S.D. New York

1 case

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. v. Altair Eyewear, Inc.

concluded

Docket:: 7:02-cv-06195; 1:10-cv-12202
Court:: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Patents:6012811 5737054 6092896

π Aspex Eyewear, Inc.π Contour Optik, Inc.Δ Altair Eyewear, Inc.

Plaintiffs asserted claims 1–3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12–14, 22–24, 26–28, and 31–33 of the '811 patent, claim 1 of the '054 patent, and claims 13–22 of the '896 patent. The district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement; the Federal Circuit affirmed non-infringement of '811 and '896, reversed the '054 construction and remanded; on remand the '054 claim was held invalid. The case concluded after further appeals and a Supreme Court petition (12-1120).

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. v. Zenni Optical, LLC

judgment affirmed

Docket:: 0:09-cv-61467; 0:09-cv-61468
Court:: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Patents:6012811 5737054 6092896

π Aspex Eyewear, Inc.π Contour Optik, Inc.Δ Zenni Optical, LLC

Plaintiffs sought a permanent injunction against infringement of US 5,737,054, 6,012,811, and 6,092,896. The district court held Aspex collaterally estopped by the Altair litigation; the Federal Circuit affirmed (12-1318).

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Designers Eyewear Studio, Inc.

Markman opinion dated 2006-12-22

Patents:6012811 5737054 6092896

π Aspex Eyewear, Inc.Δ Designers Eyewear Studio, Inc.

Markman opinion construed 'frame' and 'retaining mechanisms' in the '054, '811 and '896 patents.