5 known cases. View patent page →
This case was stayed pending the outcome of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Following a CAFC decision finding the patent unpatentable, the case is subject to dismissal.
This case was stayed pending the outcome of related PTAB proceedings. Given the CAFC's final judgment on the patent's invalidity, this case is also subject to dismissal.
The investigation was terminated based on the PTAB's decision to institute IPR proceedings, which cast significant doubt on the patent's validity.
In a Final Written Decision, the PTAB found claims 1-3, 5-13, and 15-20 unpatentable as obvious, but did not find claims 4 and 14 unpatentable. This decision was appealed to the CAFC.
In a Final Written Decision, the PTAB found claims 1–3, 5–13, and 15–20 to be unpatentable, but determined that the petitioner had not demonstrated that claims 4 and 14 were unpatentable.